onsdag 31. mars 2021

Bergen Engines - Utydelige private kontakter i saken - ABC Nyheter


En saksbehandler i Utenriksdepartementet chattet med Rolls-Royce om salget av Bergen Engines. Utenriksministeren sier hun ikke visste om dialogen.

«Kontakten hadde ikke karakter av saksbehandling, men statusoppdateringer og informasjonsformidling. Kontakten på Messenger kan i sum gi et inntrykk av at UD har hatt en mer aktiv og koordinerende rolle enn det som var tilfelle.», skriver Utenriksdepartementet (UD) og Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet i et brev til Stortinget tirsdag.

Ifølge dialogen på Facebooks meldingstjeneste Messenger, som Bergens Tidende/E24 har fått innsyn i, fikk den eksportkontrollansvarlige i Rolls-Royce beskjed fra en saksbehandler i Utenriksdepartementets seksjon for eksportkontroll om at salget av Bergen Engines til russiske TMH International neppe kunne stanses med norsk lov.

Meldingene ble sendt 8. januar i år.

Regjeringen vil stanse salget

Tirsdag i forrige uke varslet justis- og beredskapsminister Monica Mæland (H) Stortinget om at regjeringen vil bruke sikkerhetsloven til å stanse salget av Bergen Engines etter sterkt press fra Stortinget.

Grunnen er at de frykter at teknologi og kompetanse av militær og strategisk betydning vil havne i russiske hender, fordi det er antatt at TMIs eiere har nære forbindelser til Kreml og president Vladimir Putin.

I redegjørelsen for Stortinget viste justisministeren til at UD 15. desember i fjor mottok en epost fra eksportkontrollansvarlig i Rolls-Royce. Eposten inneholdt et vedlegg som omtalte et planlagt salg av Bergen Engines til TMH.

«Saken ble i første omgang formidlet i eksportkontrollsporet, men gjelder overføring av eierskap til en utenlandsk aktør, noe som faller utenfor eksportkontrollregelverket.», het det i redegjørelsen.

 

– Ikke uttrykk for norske myndigheters holdning

I brevet til Stortinget tirsdag skriver UD og Justisdepartementet at det var den eksportkontrollansvarlige i Rolls-Royce som tok initiativ til kontakten med UDs saksbehandler på Messenger, og at den kom i tillegg til den formelle kommunikasjonen.

«Kommunikasjonen var ikke uttrykk for norske myndigheters holdning til prosessen.», heter det.

BT/E24 har prøvd å få UDs saksbehandler i tale, men har ikke fått svar.

De skriver videre at omfanget av kontakten ikke var kjent for seksjonsledelsen, avdelingsledelsen eller politisk ledelse, utenom en melding fra saksbehandleren til Rolls-Royce 29. januar. Innholdet var heller ikke klarert og delen av kommunikasjonen som inneholdt arkivverdig dokumentasjon ble heller ikke journalført.

«Saksbehandleren skulle i stedet kun ha vist vedkommende videre til relevante departementer, etter at det innledningsvis ble avklart at dette ikke var en eksportkontrollsak og at den ikke skulle saksbehandles i UD.», skriver departementene.

Utenriksministeren ble informert fredag

Utenriksminister Ine Eriksen Søreide sier til BT/E24 at hun først ble kjent med at Messenger-meldingene fantes på fredag. Stortinget har nå fått en utskrift av meldingene.

tirsdag 30. mars 2021

RAAF 100 år i dag - Jeg stemte på F-111 som deres mest spektakulære fly gjennom tidene - Australian Aviation

 

YOU VOTE F-111 THE RAAF’S GREATEST AIRCRAFT ON CENTENARY DAY

written by Adam Thorn | March 30, 2021
One of the F-111 shots from Australian Aviation’s archive

On this very day 100 years ago, the Australian Air Force was formed, and five months later, its Royal designation was added to create the Royal Australian Air Force.

It was only the second “Royal” air arm in the British Commonwealth, following the formation of the RAF.

To celebrate, Australian Aviation has been opening our archive to show you our best photos of RAAF aircraft during the organisation’s 100-year history. But then we thought, what’s the best?

Our poll received more than 1,300 votes but the winner, unsurprisingly, was the F-111, which smashed its rivals with more than 40 per cent of the vote.

You can see the full rundown, with bios and links to our archive, in our special RAAF 100 In Focus digital edition, released today to mark the big occasion. Click this link to subscribe and read.

It features an exclusive interview with the Chief of Air Force, Air Marshal Mel Hupfeld; an introduction from Minister for Defence Industry Melissa Price; as well as some of the best features from Australian Aviation’s history, examining the inner workings of the RAAF.

And throughout today, we’ll be updating you online on the latest from the celebrations. In particular, if you’re reading this bright and early, see our guide to today’s Canberra flypast, detailing when every aircraft will fly at what time.

Gjenbruk av Andøya Flystasjon - ABC Nyheter

Forsvarsministeren lover raske svar om etterbruk av Andøya flystasjon

NTB

for 8 timer siden


© Leveres av ABC Nyheter Et Orion-fly lander på Andøya flystasjon i 1969. Både fly og mannskap skal flyttes til Evenes. Foto: Per Gram

Forsvarsdepartementet har nå mottatt Forsvarsbyggs reviderte eiendomsstrategi for fremtidig disponering av arealene på Andøya flystasjon, ifølge en pressemelding tirsdag.

– Vi tar sikte på en rask behandling av revidert eiendomsstrategi for bruk og utvikling av arealene og infrastrukturen ved flystasjonen som Forsvarsbygg nå har levert og er trygge på at det gode arbeidet fortsetter parallelt, sier forsvarsminister Frank Bakke-Jensen (H).

Les også:Andøya i limbo i ny forsvarsplan

– Utviklingen i den sikkerhetspolitiske situasjonen de siste årene medfører at Forsvaret har behov for tilgang til noe infrastruktur på flystasjonen. Men vi søker å avgrense det omfanget til et absolutt minimum. Det har vært viktig for meg at forsvarssektoren lytter til kommunens og næringslivets behov, og at man sammen finner løsninger som i størst mulig grad tilfredsstiller alle parter i arbeidet videre, sier legger han til.

Andøya flystasjon ble vedtatt nedlagt i 2016, trass i voldsomme protester lokalt.

– Veikartet for etterbruken av Andøya flystasjon skal bygge oppunder målet om vekst og utvikling av Andøy-samfunnet og ivareta Forsvarets operative behov. Dette er bare en start, og allerede rett etter påske tar vi dette arbeidet videre, sier direktør Thorbjørn Thoresen i Forsvarsbygg.

mandag 29. mars 2021

Helikopterulykke - Detaljer ukjent - Twitter video

 Nesehjulet ser ut til å være låst. Det kan ha vesentlig betydning for power input dersom låsen på hjulet plutselig frigjøres. Data er ikke kjent i skrivende stund.: https://tinyurl.com/saj6yz8a

Passasjerfly i Mach 4 - AIN

 

AIN Alerts
March 29, 2021  

Aerion Targeting Mach 4 and 7,000-nm for 50-passenger AS3

 - March 29, 2021, 9:01 AM
AS3 (Photo: Aerion)
Aerion plans on providing further detail of what is to become its second supersonic aircraft, the AS3, but did reveal the 50-passenger airliner will reach or exceed Mach 4 and fly 7,000 nm. (Photo: Aerion)

Aerion is taking the next step in its quest for a family of supersonic jets, revealing on Monday the initial details for its second aircraft—the 50-passenger, Mach 4-plus AS3. Fuller details of the airliner companion to its AS2 Mach 1.4 business jet are anticipated later this year, Aerion said, but sketched out a goal of reaching near-hypersonic speeds and a 7,000-nm range for the AS3.

The aircraft is anticipated to fly before the end of the decade, the company projected, adding that it will build on the AS2 that is anticipated to be in service by then.

Aerion said the AS3 further will benefit from the fruits of its ongoing partnership with NASA’s Langley Research Center. Earlier this year, Aerion had announced an expansion of that partnership to study flight in the Mach 3 to 5 range.

“At Aerion, our vision is to build a future where humanity can travel between any two points on our planet within three hours,” reiterated Aerion chairman, president, and CEO Tom Vice, who outlined this vision during an AIAA Aviation Forum in June 2020. “Supersonic flight is the starting point, but it is just that—the beginning. To truly revolutionize global mobility as we know it today, we must push the boundaries of what is possible.”

Vice called the AS3 its next step in the company’s long-term technology roadmap and said it “will bring Aerion’s high-Mach-flight capability to a broader audience; we look forward to sharing more on our design later this year.”

Meanwhile, Aerion said it is on track to begin production of the AS2 in 2023.


T-38A Talon - A Pilot Report of the White Rocket - Pinterest


T-38A Pilot Report
By Buck Wyndham, Major, USAFR


 

 



The T-38 is one of those rare airplanes that, in my opinion, looks perfect from every angle. When I was a child, I built a plastic model of it, and I spent many happy hours making it swoop, roll and dive its way through my house. One of my dreams was to fly this beautiful airplane for real. Years later, I got the chance to do so, first as a student pilot, and later in my career, as an US Air Force Instructor Pilot for two consecutive tours. I've moved on to become an airline pilot now, but I still fly the T-38 about a dozen times each month as a Reserve Associate Instructor Pilot for the Air Force Reserve. Sometimes I have to pinch myself to see if this all a dream. I'd like to share with you some of my impressions on flying the "White Rocket."

Let's start with a walkaround inspection. Access to the T-38 cockpit is usually gained by use of a sturdy ladder that hooks over the edge of the canopy. After climbing up and storing your in-flight publications and instrument approach plates in the map case on the right cockpit sidewall, you hang your helmet on the right canopy rail where it will be out of your way until you get strapped in. Still standing on the ladder, you lean into the cockpit and turn on the battery, then check the fuel and oxygen quantity, landing gear lights, and cockpit warning lights. The battery switch is selected "off," then you check the aircraft's maintenance forms to ensure the plane is ready to fly. Everything looks good, so you stow the forms under the seat. Since you'll be doing a little bending and stooping during your preflight inspection, you take off your parachute and lay it on the ramp to make sure you don't damage it or accidentally catch the D-ring on something.

The walkaround begins at the left engine inlet and continues clockwise. You check the usual items, paying special attention to the condition of the honeycomb-composite flight control surfaces and wingtips. These items can be easily damaged, and are often the first things that show cracks or buckling from being overstressed. Other areas of interest are the wing attach points and landing gear side-brace trunnions, both of which are left unpainted so they can be inspected for cracks. At airshows and other public showings of the airplane, many people notice that the tires look as though they are worn out and frayed. This is because the tires are made of multiple layers containing white-colored cords, with the final, inner layers containing red cords. After a couple of landings, multiple layers of white cords are exposed. This is completely normal, and the tires may be safely used until the first red cords are showing. The landing gear doors and speedbrakes are left open after each flight so that the next pilot can inspect the hydraulic actuators and other items in these areas.

The landing gear pins and pitot tube cover are stored in the fueling access panel below the left engine inlet, and the Angle-of-Attack (AOA) vane locking-device (about the size of your fist) is stored in the left-hand cockpit storage compartment. At this time, the grounding wire is unplugged from the nose and moved away from the airplane.

Before I strap in the airplane, I always walk to a spot in front of the nose and look at the overall "Big Picture." I do this not only as a final check of the condition of the plane, but also because I really enjoy looking at the sleek lines of the machine that is about to launch me into the blue. It's hard to believe that the Talon was designed more than 40 years ago. Its tapered waist, razor thin wings and long, graceful fuselage are timeless design features, and it will always be a prototypical "fast jet" image in the minds of many airplane lovers. The excitement level begins to mount as you strap on your parachute and climb the ladder. You step onto the seat cushion, then you lower yourself into a sitting position in the small but comfortable cockpit.

 




For better or worse, the T-38A's "round-dial" instrument panel (seen here) has
now been replaced with a modern, all-glass cockpit in the T-38C.
In this writer's opinion, the "A"-Model T-38 was pure magic.


The crew chief helps you strap in, connecting your G-suit while you thread the shoulder straps, crotch strap, and parachute "key" onto the tongue of the right lap belt. The tongue is inserted into the receptacle on the left lap belt until it clicks, then you tighten everything down. Your helmet goes on next, then you connect your oxygen hose and communication cord. You and the airplane have become one.

You turn on the battery and run through your cockpit instrument and system checks. Since the plane is so simple, this only takes about one minute. Most of the switches are already in the proper position; you're just verifying that they're correct. You turn on the radio and call Clearance Delivery for your departure clearance, then monitor Ground Control for the engine start.

The T-38 has no self-start capability; it needs a supply of pressurized air to rotate the engines. This air is supplied by a "huffer" unit or palouste, which is connected via a large hose to a manifold on the bottom of the airplane, near the left engine. During start, the ground crewman must manually switch the air to the other engine after the first one is started. We're ready to start, so you give the crew chief the "air" signal by raising your arms over your head, making a fist with your left hand and slamming it into your right palm. The air rushes into the right engine, and a rising whine begins as the RPM increases. At 14% RPM, you signal that you're ready to start. You reach down with your left hand and press the right engine start button, then move the right throttle to idle. Light-off and spool-up are quick, and the engine is stable at idle RPM less than eight seconds after ignition. The crew chief moves the air diverter valve to the left engine, and you start it the same way. You check the caution-light panel to make sure the engines and related systems are operating correctly, then the ground crewman disconnects the air hose.


Next, you run through a series of flight control checks with the ground crewman. He insures that the control surfaces move the way they are supposed to, the main landing gear doors have closed, the speedbrakes close properly, and the horizontal stabilator moves to its proper takeoff setting. This completed, you check the flight instruments, cockpit indicators, and navigation gear. The ground crewman removes the wheel chocks on your signal, and it's time to taxi. Ground Control clears you for action.

The T-38's nosewheel steering system is activated by holding down a rather stiff button at the base of the stick. As you add power to start rolling forward, you squeeze the button hard. Full pedal deflection turns you smartly away from the parking spot, and you check the heading indicators to make sure they're turning. While taxiing out to the runway, you review the Takeoff and Landing Data (TOLD), which you wrote on your knee-mounted data card before leaving the squadron's Operations building. Specifically, you look at four numbers and commit them to memory: The Minimum Acceleration Check Speed (the speed at which you should be traveling when you are a certain distance down the runway, usually 2000 feet. This number validates all the other numbers, and ensures you have a normally-performing airplane); the Go/No-Go Speed (where you decide to continue the takeoff or abort); the Refusal Speed (the highest speed you can attain and still theoretically stop in the remaining runway length); and the Single-Engine Takeoff Speed (the minimum speed you need in order to take off after an engine failure.) Such cautiousness is required by the military's many years of operational experience with the Talon, and from the experiences of many pilots no longer with us -- whose ignorance of these numbers lead to their demise.

You're at the end of the runway. Tower clears you for takeoff. You reach up with your left hand and grab the edge of the canopy frame, lift it slightly, then pull it down as your right hand moves the right sidewall-mounted locking lever forward. The canopy locks with a satisfying clunk, and the red "Canopy" light on the instrument panel extinguishes. Almost immediately, you feel a slight "fullness" in your ears as the cabin pressurization system goes to work. Taxiing into position on the runway, you turn on the pitot heat and transponder, and check the heading system again. Now the fun begins.


You point the nose down the runway, letting the plane roll forward slightly until the nosewheel is exactly straight. Now you stop and pump the brake pedals a few times before standing on them as hard as you can. You push the throttles up to the Military Power setting and wait impatiently for the engine instruments to stabilize. The brakes require a lot of effort to hold to hold the T-38 stationary at MIL power, and after 5 seconds, your legs are already beginning to tire from the effort. A quick check of the gauges, and it's time to blast off. You simultaneously release the brakes and shove the throttles past the MIL power detent and into Afterburner. The plane jumps forward, somewhat slowly at first, then with a sudden kick as the 'burners ignite. The initial acceleration in afterburner is about like that of a high performance sports car, but once past 90 knots, the acceleration rate greatly increases. Like most jets, "the faster it goes, the faster it goes faster." There is little or no engine noise in the cockpit. During the takeoff roll, you note the passing of each of the critical performance numbers, each one a milestone toward liftoff. At 135 knots, you begin applying back pressure to the stick, and at 160 knots, you lift off. The acceleration continues.

Immediately after liftoff, you raise the gear and flaps to avoid over-speeding them. More acceleration. 240 knots comes quickly, and you pull the engines out of afterburner, slowing the acceleration somewhat. You keep the nose low, only 3 or 4 degrees high, until 300 knots, then raise the nose to 12 degrees to keep the speed at the 300-knot legal maximum below 10,000 feet. (The T-38 has a waiver to the usual 250-knot limit.) At this point the altimeter begins a rapid upward climb. On cold days, using only the normal non-afterburner climb schedule, I've observed a sustained climb rate of over 12,000 feet per minute for the initial portion of the climb. A full-afterburner climb at 300 knots results in a calculated initial climb rate of 30,000 feet per minute. At that rate, the altimeter needle spins one full rotation every two seconds. The controls are well-harmonized and glass-smooth, responding to the slightest movement in a natural, pleasing way. Pitch forces are fairly heavy in the Talon, especially at higher G levels, but this trait helps to prevent inexperienced student pilots from over-"G"ing the airplane any more than they normally try to do already. 

 


Leveling off at 16,000 feet in your designated practice area, you check the oxygen system, pressurization, fuel quantity and balance, G-suit and altimeter. Everything looks good, so it's time to have a little fun. You push the throttles to MIL and lower the nose to build airspeed. The wind noise around the canopy increases steadily, as does the pitch sensitivity of the stick. At 10,000 feet and 500 knots indicated airspeed, you squeeze your leg and abdomen muscles, then smoothly bring the stick back until the G-meter (or your backside) says "5."  The back-stick force required is approximately 30 pounds. The Gs press you into your seat and the blood tries to drain out of your brain. As the nose slowly tracks up past the vertical position, the altimeter is spinning like a fan and the Gs begin to subside as the airspeed decreases. You're over the top, inverted, at 20,000 feet, with an airspeed of 200 knots. You have just gained 10,000 feet in a matter of about 15 seconds. You pull the nose down to the 45-degree nose-low point, unload to about zero G, roll rapidly upright, and pull up to level flight at 400 knots, completing half of a "Cuban Eight."

 


How about an aileron roll? You raise the nose 5 degrees and move the stick to the side about 4 inches. The world rotates smoothly around over your head and back below you again. Next, you do the same thing again, only this time you move the stick to its full deflection, causing your head to snap violently the other direction as the roll rate increases instantly to 720 degrees per second. At two rotations per second, it is very difficult to time the aileron neutralization to arrive perfectly wings-level again. You overshoot by 30 degrees, but there's a wide grin forming under your oxygen mask.

The T-38 can be flown throughout its performance envelope, from aerobatics to patterns and landings, with barely any use of the rudder. With the landing gear retracted, only 6 degrees of rudder deflection is available, and in the landing configuration, 30 degrees is available.

Like an arrow, the Talon goes where it is pointed, not where it is banked. This means that turns are accomplished by banking in the desired direction (thus placing the lift vector where the plane needs to go) and pulling the nose to the desired point. To lower the nose to gain airspeed for an aerobatic maneuver, it is simpler and more comfortable to roll the plane upside down, pull the nose down to the desired pitch, then roll it upright again.

Stalls are quite unconventional in the Talon. Unlike most training airplanes, the T-38 does not exhibit a normal "stall break" and nose-drop at the stall. Instead, the pitch attitude remains almost level, and the Angle of Attack and airframe buffet both increase dramatically. If the stick is held aft, and the recovery is not initiated, the plane enters an un-commanded "wing rock" of up to 60 degrees of left and right bank. In this level, wing-rocking attitude, the airplane sinks nearly vertically at decent rates of well over 6,000 feet per minute. Proper recovery takes full afterburner, a good deal of pilot finesse, and plenty of altitude. Because of this unusual stall trait, student pilots in the Talon are given plenty of instruction in recognizing and recovering from the approach-to-stall. The T-38 is not approved for spins.

 

 


 

Supersonic flight in the T-38 is almost a non-event. Usually, you enter it from a shallow dive beginning at approximately 32,000 feet. Although it is possible to exceed Mach 1.0 using Military power in a steep dive, it is far more expeditious to use afterburner. You set up a 10 degree dive, then ease the throttles forward over the hump. You observe the nozzle position indicators swing, indicating the 'burners have lit, and watch the Mach window on the airspeed indicator. 0.91...0.94...0.97... The airplane is stable and smooth. Somewhere around 0.98, the vertical speed indicator, airspeed indicator and altimeter briefly rise and fall, spiking "out of synch" with their previous trends. This is evidence of the bow wave passing over and moving aft on the pitot tube. Next, as the Mach increases from 0.99 to 1.03, there is a subtle change in the way the stick feels. It becomes slightly more stiff, as if an autopilot servo had become engaged somewhere in the control system. This vague stiffness remains constant as you accelerate. You are now supersonic. You look around, half-expecting to see... something. But all is calm and quiet. No warped stars. No Elvis sighting. But it's still special and rare. Sacred, in some way.

While the manual states that the aircraft is capable of approximately Mach 1.3, the aircraft is blasting across the practice area at an amazing clip, so you limit yourself to Mach 1.15 for 60 seconds or so, feeling out the stiff controls and analyzing how the airplane feels during a steep turn and an aileron roll. The far end of your reserved corridor of airspace is rapidly approaching, and you are out of room for anything more. You gingerly pull each throttle out of afterburner, one at a time to avoid a flameout, then raise the pitch to 10 degrees nose-high. Decelerating through Mach 1.0, you note the same brief fluctuations in the pitot-static instruments. And then it's over. You're back to the drab, plain world of subsonic -- the world everyone else in the world lives in. The fuel gauges show that it's time to go home. You extend the speedbrakes and pull the throttles to idle, resulting in a descent rate of over 15,000 feet per minute at 300 knots.

The landing pattern is entered from "initial," an upwind leg over the runway at 1,500 feet and 300 knots. At midfield, you crisply roll into a 65- to 70-degree bank and pull the airplane around a 180-degree turn, losing 70 knots of airspeed and arriving on the downwind leg with approximately one half-mile spacing from the runway. Abeam the landing zone, you lower the landing gear and flaps, then push the power up to maintain around 200 knots. At the "perch" point, 45 degrees past the runway threshold, you roll into a 45-degree banked turn, lower the nose about 5 degrees, and begin pulling the airplane around the final turn. The T-38 has an unusual airframe buffet at its optimum final-turn Angle of Attack (AOA). New Talon pilots must develop a feel for this phenomenon, and must cross-check their airspeed, AOA and vertical speed carefully to avoid developing a dangerous sink rate during the final turn. Once established on final, you adjust your speed to 155 knots, plus one knot for every 100 pounds of fuel in excess of 1,000 pounds. For example, with 2,500 pounds of fuel on board, the desired final approach speed is 155+15, or 170 knots. This speed is adjusted upward for gusty winds, or no-flap configurations. (The speed for no-flap approaches is 170 knots, plus the additions mentioned above.)

There's another oddity you'll notice when landing the T-38: On final approach, your aim point must be approximately 450 feet short of the runway threshold. Approaching the threshold, you shift this aim point ever so slightly to a point about 500 feet down the runway, smoothly bring the throttles to idle, and flare very slightly. This technique results in a threshold crossing altitude of about 20 feet, and a landing approximately 500 to 800 feet down the runway. Once on the ground during a full-stop landing, the nose is raised slowly (and carefully, to avoid hopping the aircraft off the ground) to a 12 degree nose-high aerobrake attitude. This is a more effective way to slow down than using the Talon's rather weak wheel brakes. The nosewheel is lowered to the runway at 100 knots. The normal landing distance is between 4,000 and 7,500 feet, depending on pilot technique, condition of the runway, and flap position. A heavyweight no-flap landing on a wet runway can easily consume more than 9,000 feet of runway, a fact which severely limits your options under such conditions. Most T-38 bases have a "rabbit-catcher" web barrier on at least one of their runways, which gives significant peace-of-mind to pilots who might, due to various factors or malfunctions, expect a long landing roll.

Back at the parking area, the Crew Chief places chocks around your main tires, and signals for shutdown. You release the throttle gate, pull up on the finger-lifts, and pull the throttles to the 'cutoff' position. As the engines spool down to a graceful stop, you take off your helmet and let the warm breeze blow across your face. You don't want to climb out quite yet, so you linger for a moment, savoring the view of the pointy nose ahead of you, and the petite wings protruding from the fuselage far behind you. The Crew Chief smiles, but doesn't ask any questions.

The Talon is truly one of the great airplanes of our time. It is a timeless beauty, and has performed superbly for over four decades as an advanced trainer in several air forces around the world, as well as a test support vehicle, chase ship, companion/proficiency trainer, light attack/fighter trainer, airshow performer, and privately-owned personal rocketship. While not a complex or difficult airplane to fly, it nevertheless has some unique flight characteristics that demand absolute precision and discipline from its pilot. More than 50,000 student pilots have received their Air Force wings in the Talon and, with the old airframes now being refurbished and reborn as the T-38C, many thousands more will get to experience the thrill of riding the "White Rocket" in the decades ahead.

Buck Wyndham, Major, USAFR
December 1999

 


 

 

 

Southwest lar seg ikke rokke som Boeing kunder - Curt Lewis

 

Southwest Airlines adds 100 orders for Boeing 737 MAX jet

(Reuters) - U.S. budget carrier Southwest Airlines Co said on Monday it had reached a deal with planemaker Boeing Co for 100 orders for a variant of the 737 MAX aircraft, with the first 30 jets scheduled for delivery in 2022.

The development comes days after Reuters reported here that Boeing was close to a multibillion-dollar deal to sell dozens of its 737 MAX 7 jets to Southwest, in potentially the jet maker's largest 737 MAX order since the aircraft's safety ban was lifted in 2020 end.

Each 737 MAX 7 carries a list price of roughly $100 million, though such jets usually sell for less than half their official value with typical market discounts, according to aircraft industry sources.

Southwest said it had converted 70 orders for the 737 MAX 8 aircraft to 737 MAX 7 orders, with an additional 155 optional orders for 737 MAX 7 or 737 MAX 8 planes for 2022 through 2029.

The changes in Southwest’s order book result in a total of 349 orders and 270 options for the 737 MAX jet for 2021 through 2031, compared with a previous 249 orders and 115 options for the 737 MAX aircraft for 2021 through 2026.

Er F-35 som prosjekt en katastrofe? - Curt Lewis

 

The F-35 may be unsalvageable

 

The 2021 reviews of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) are in, and they are not glowing.

On Jan. 14, 2021, then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller labeled the JSF a “piece of [expletive].” Then, on March 5, 2021, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) called the program a “rathole,” and asked whether it was time to stop spending that much money for “such a low capability?”

The JSF has become the embodiment of the Defense Department’s (DOD) broken weapons acquisition system, which has been on the Government Accountability Office’s High-Risk List since 1990. The F-35 was originally conceived as the low-end of a high-low strategy consisting of numerous cheap aircraft that would replace Cold War workhorses like the F-16 and A-10, among other aircraft. The plan was for the JSF to be complimented by a smaller fleet of more advanced fighters, to be developed later.

The program has been under continuous development since the contract was awarded in 2001 and has faced innumerable delays and cost overruns. Total acquisition costs now exceed $428 billion, nearly double the initial estimate of $233 billion, with projected lifetime operations and maintenance costs of $1.727 trillion.

On April 26, 2016, then-Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) called the JSF program “both a scandal and a tragedy with respect to cost, schedule and performance.” In February 2014, Frank Kendall, then-under secretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, referred to the purchase of the F-35 as “acquisition malpractice,” a description that has yet to be improved upon.

The JSF has been plagued by a staggering array of persistent issues, many of which were highlighted in the fiscal 2019 DOD Operational Test and Evaluation Annual Report, which revealed 873 unresolved deficiencies including 13 Category 1 items, involving the most serious flaws that could endanger crew and aircraft. While this is an overall reduction from the 917 unresolved deficiencies and 15 Category 1 items found in September 2018, the report stated that “although the program is working to fix deficiencies, new discoveries are still being made, resulting in only a minor decrease in the overall number of deficiencies.”

Many of the problems with the program can be traced to the decision to develop and procure the aircraft simultaneously. Whenever problems have been identified, contractors needed to go back and make changes to planes that were already assembled, adding to overall costs.

Despite the abject failure of the JSF, the DOD is revisiting the high-low approach. According to Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Brown, the F-35, intended to serve as a low-end utilitarian aircraft, is now a high-end sports car: “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays.” On March 10, 2021, the Air Force accepted delivery of the first of 144 upgraded F-15EXs. Brown is targeting the fiscal 2023 budget request to fund an F-16 replacement. The old low end has become the new high end, and those F-16s and A-10s still need to be replaced.

Although it has an extraordinarily poor track record, killing off the JSF entirely will prove difficult. According to a map showing the economic impact across the country on Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Lightning II website, the only states that do not have at least one supplier for the aircraft are Hawaii and North Dakota. This gives all but two representatives and four senators more than enough incentive to not only keep greasing the wheels, but also to add 32 earmarks for the JSF program, costing $10.6 billion, since fiscal 2001. There has also been significant investment in the program by NATO members and other allies. The best taxpayers can likely hope for, barring an uncharacteristic recalibration with reality from the Pentagon, is that the program gets significantly scaled back.

The DOD is at an inflection point. The design by committee, Swiss Army knife approach has been a resounding failure. Moving forward, the Pentagon must avoid purchasing aircraft prior to completion of the design and development phases and reduce the red tape that has slowed down the process. In the interim, the time has come reduce the cost and scope of the F-35 program.

 

 

Helikoptersikkerheten under lupen i Malaysia - Curt Lewis

Safety exercises ordered for helicopter operators in Malaysia

The Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia (CAAM) has ordered local helicopter operators, maintenance organizations and helicopter pilots to participate in a mandatory safety awareness exercise

(Courtesy: CAAM)

Chester Voo, CAAM CEO, said immediate action was needed to address safety concerns involving helicopter operations in the country, following a third air accident involving helicopters in less than six months. On 8 November 2020, two Guimbal Cabri helicopters collided during a training flight on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur.

One of the aircraft crashed, claiming the lives of former Royal Malaysian Navy officer Mohamed Sabri Baharom and Mohd Irfan Fikri Mohamed Rawi. Former Malaysia Airlines CEO Datuk Ahmad Jauhari Yahya and his passenger, Tan Chai Eian survived after their chopper made an emergency landing.

All helicopter operators in Malaysia are inspected

"CAAM wishes to clarify that all helicopter operators in Malaysia are fully inspected and are required to hold valid licences and maintenance certificates to ensure the validity of the pilots' qualification as well as the airworthiness of the helicopters," Voo said in a statement.

The Air Accident Investigation Bureau under the Transport Ministry will investigate the cause of the incident, while CAAM will carry out exercises to ensure that these risks are mitigated to prevent further incidents, Voo added. "This careful action is done in the fair execution of Malaysian regulations and most importantly, in the interest of the safety of all.

Recently, the US Helicopter Safety Team has developed a new Recommended Practices document focusing on ‘Spatial Disorientation Induced by a Degraded Visual Environment’ and offering training and decision-making solutions.