Drone Ditching Said to Show Need for Care on Unmanned
AircraftThe ditching of a government surveillance drone off the
California coast shows the U.S. must move cautiously on integrating unmanned
aircraft into the skies, a pilots' union leader said.
U.S. Customs and
Border Protection grounded its fleet of nine remaining drones used to monitor
borders and ports after operators had to guide an unmanned aircraft into the
Pacific Ocean after a mechanical failure Jan. 27.
The accident renewed debate over how swiftly the government should bring
unmanned aircraft into the aviation system and how tight the safety standards
should be. The Federal Aviation Administration is working on standards for
civilian drones, which are now banned in U.S. airspace, and has approved six
test sites.
"It creates a more complex problem than just pointing it out
to sea," Sean Cassidy, national safety coordinator for the Air Line Pilots
Association, said in an interview.
The loss of the General Atomics
Aeronautical Systems Inc. Predator B shows the issues the FAA must consider if
drones will be allowed to fly within a few miles of airliners, Cassidy, who is
also first vice president of the largest pilots' union in North America,
said.
The Predator went into the Pacific Ocean about 11:15 p.m. local
time on Jan. 27 around 20 miles southwest of San Diego, Michael Friel, an agency
spokesman, said in an e-mail yesterday. The National Transportation Safety Board
is investigating, Keith Holloway, a spokesman, said in an interview.
The
crew operating the drone, which was modified for maritime environments, put it
into the water after determining it couldn't reach its Sierra Vista, Arizona,
base, Friel said.
'Cause Unknown'
"The cause of the failure is
unknown," he said. "There were no injuries as a result of this emergency
landing."
Because the FAA hasn't drafted regulations allowing routine
unmanned-aircraft use, government agencies can only operate drones if they
receive special permits.
CBP uses its aircraft to patrol both U.S. coasts
and the borders with Mexico and Canada, Jenny Burke, a spokeswoman, said in an
interview.
The Predator B, also known as the MQ-9 Reaper in the U.S. Air
Force, can fly as many as 27 hours and reach an altitude of 50,000 feet (15,240
meters), according to the website of Poway, California-based General Atomics. It
has a wingspan of 66 feet (20 meters) and can carry more than 3,000 pounds
(1,361 kilograms) of cameras, weapons or other payload, according to the
company. Each Predator costs about $18 million.
Safety Debate
General
Atomics deferred comment to CBP, Kimberly Kasitz, a spokeswoman, said in an
e-mail. At least some of the aircraft was recovered from the water while a U.S.
Coast Guard cutter stood watch, Petty Officer Connie Terrell said in an
interview.
The NTSB, which determines the cause of aviation accidents,
has assigned an agency specialist in unmanned aircraft to the case, Holloway
said. The FAA will assist.
The pilots' union understands that the drone
industry is growing rapidly and will inevitably find its place in the skies
alongside passenger planes, Cassidy said. The union doesn't want the
introduction of unmanned aircraft to threaten the improving safety of airline
operations, he said.
"If you are going to meet that same high safety bar,
it means you better be very careful, very deliberative," he said.
ALPA
supports requiring drone pilots to be licensed by the FAA. It also has called on
the FAA to certify the safety of drone designs as it does manned
aircraft.
'No Big Deal'
Others said the Predator accident doesn't
necessarily signal the need to move slowly.
"I don't really see this as a
big deal," Mary Cummings, director of Duke University's Humans and Autonomy
Laboratory, said in an e-mail.
Aircraft such as the Predator, which have
no humans aboard and were designed for military use, shouldn't have to meet the
same safety standards as a commercial aircraft, she said.
After a Customs
Predator B crashed into a hillside near Nogales, Arizona, on April 25, 2006, the
NTSB concluded an operator inadvertently shut off the plane's engine while
trying to deal with a radio-link failure.
Investigators found that the
Predator's pilot, who was supposed to be monitored by an instructor, had been
allowed to fly it by himself. The operator, a General Atomics employee, didn't
follow the company's procedures for addressing radio- control issues, the NTSB
found.
'Minimal Oversight'
"The investigation also revealed that the
CBP was providing a minimal amount of operational oversight," NTSB said in its
findings.
FAA air-traffic controllers typically restrict Customs drone
flights to areas where piloted aircraft are banned.
The agency's drone
operations were faulted for safety shortfalls in a 2012 report by the Homeland
Security Department's inspector general.
Two of the four ground stations
from which CBP operated Predators didn't have the backup control equipment
required in its operations handbook, according to the report. A third station
received a waiver to fly without the backup equipment, according to the
report.
Customs, in response to the report, said it intended to increase
funding to support the flight operations.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.