Lion Air crew castigated in Bali crash final report
The final report into the crash of a Lion Air Boeing
737-800 aircraft on short finals to land at Denpasar's Ngurah Rai International
airport on 13 April 2013 has identified several safety issues around the skill
of the pilots and the carrier's emergency response procedures.
The
National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC) report retains the same
chronology as the preliminary report issued in May 2013. As with the earlier
report, it highlights the failure of the captain and first officer to
communicate effectively prior to impacting the water. The final report also
refers to CCTV footage, which shows the extent of the rainy weather immediately
prior to the crash, which prevented the flight crew from seeing the
runway.
The first officer, who was flying, mentioned that the runway was
not in sight as the aircraft descended through 900ft on final approach after an
uneventful flight from Bandung. Although the aircraft's automated systems issued
a "minimum" warning at 550ft, the crew disengaged the autopilot and
autothrottle, and continued the descent flying manually.
At 300ft, the
report reveals that the cockpit voice recorder picked up a sound consistent with
rain hitting the windshield, although there was no sound of windshield wipers.
When the 737 had descended to just 150ft, the captain took control of the
aircraft, while the first officer again said that he could not see the
runway.
During interviews, the captain maintained that he was confident
the runway would appear at any moment. It was only when the enhanced ground
proximity warning system called a 20ft height alert that the pilot commanded a
go-around but, just 1s later, the aircraft impacted the water. Though there were
no fatalaties among the 101 passenges and seven crew, four passengers suffered
serious injuries. The aircraft, bearing registration PK-LKS, was a complete hull
loss.
"The (pilot in command's) expectation that he would be able to see
the runway after the rain can be considered as inability to accurately perceive
what was going on in the flight deck and outside the aircraft, including the
thunderstorm formation that was observed at an aircraft altitude below 900ft.
This might be due to unutilised resources available in the flight deck and the
limited visibility due to the hazy conditions which made the pilot unable to see
the thunderstorm formation properly."
The report makes it clear that the
captain's go around decision came far too late. It notes that the bare minimum
altitude for a 737 go around is 50 feet, as 30 feet of altitude are lost when
executing the manoeuvre. The manoeuvre also demands three seconds to executive
effectively.
After the aircraft came to rest in the water, the report
shows that the crew handled the evacuation poorly. The first officer initally
attempted to evacuate passengers through the right cockpit window. When this
proved unviable, he conducted the evacuation through the right-hand service
door.
Meanwhile, a flight attendant on the left side of the aircraft was
unable to detach a life raft from the aircraft, as her only training for this
exercise consisted of watching a video.
The report lists 13
recommendations for five parties including Lion Air, airport operator PT Angkasa
Pura I, and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation.
The key
recommendations, however, focus on ensuring the pilots employ effective crew
resource management skills, hand flying skills, and emergency procedures.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.