The Navy's $13B first of its
kind Ford class supercarrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), which now has Carrier Air
Wing 8 embarked onboard, is slowly showing signs of improvement to its various
systems after a litany of engineering setbacks, but it still has a long
way to go before becoming available for actual operational deployments. As
such, the Navy's 10 Nimitz class carriers will
continue providing for America's national defense needs alone. Beyond their
general configurations, the two classes have major differences, both outwardly
visible and not. Pictures released by the Navy today showing the USS Harry S.
Truman sailing
alongside USS Gerald R. Ford give us our best
visual comparison yet of the two classes.
CHECK OUT THE CHANGES TO
SUPERCARRIER USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S ISLAND STRUCTURE AFTER REFITBy Tyler
RogowayPosted in THE WAR ZONE
NEW REPORT ON THE NAVY'S
TROUBLED FORD CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIER IS LITERALLY THE SHITSBy Joseph
TrevithickPosted in THE WAR ZONE
BEHOLD THE NAVY'S NEW RADAR FOR
NIMITZ CLASS CARRIERS AND AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPSBy Tyler
RogowayPosted in THE WAR ZONE
NAVY SHELVES REVIEW THAT MIGHT
HAVE CUT FORD CLASS PRODUCTION TO BUILD SMALLER CARRIERSBy Joseph
TrevithickPosted in THE WAR ZONE
PRIVATE AGGRESSORS STRESS TEST
THE AIR DEFENSES ON THE NAVY'S NEWEST AIRCRAFT CARRIERBy Joseph
TrevithickPosted in THE WAR ZONE
The best image of the lot
is seen below.
It shows the differences in the island superstructures, which is
the most radical visual change between the two classes. The Nimitz class'
superstructure has changed substantially over the years itself and still varies
a bit from ship-to-ship in some instances. You can read all about this in this past story of ours. However, on the Ford class, the island's
footprint was substantially shrunk and it was moved back by 140 feet on the
ship to provide for more deck space overall and to create a deck layout that is
supposed to enhance operational tempo substantially.
USN
Its unique shape comes
from the requirement to house its active electronically scanned array (AESA) Dual Band
Radar (DBR). This radar has six separate arrays, one smaller and one larger on
three of the island's sides, providing 360-degree coverage around the ship. The
old spinning 3D and 2D radars that have been staples on earlier carriers have been
totally eliminated. The DBR, which has been mired in its own
developmental and technical issues, has effectively been canceled going
forward. The Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar (EASR), which uses just three
arrays and will have major commonality across the Navy's flattop fleet and
among many of its new surface combatants, will be installed on all
other Ford class carriers from the
future USS John F. Kennedy (CVN-79) onward. You
can read all about EASR and its future aboard the Navy's flattops and other
ships in this past piece of ours. Regardless, the point
here is that the DBR is now a one-off unique to Ford, but the island design
won't change much because it will still need to sport the EASR's three large
active electronically scanned arrays (AESA).
The images below show the overall configuration of
both ships and the differences in their deck layouts. The Ford class has just three
aircraft elevators instead of four, but their placement and larger size are
supposed to actually enhance operations, not hinder them. The Navy also says
that the larger flight deck area will help the ship achieve its goal of being
able to execute 25 percent more sorties per day than its predecessor, an
aspiration that is still far from being realized at this time.
Another big change is the
large and box-like 'wing' structures on the Ford's stern. These provide
a large increase of room on the hangar deck for storage, work areas, and more.
Topside they offer a large surface area for mounting future defensive
weaponry, such as lasers, and sensors to be
mounted. They could even possibly accommodate a vertical launch system of some
sort one day.
These are just some of the
major external design changes you can see in these images. A seemingly endless
list of changes lies beneath the Ford's skin, many of which
you may never even notice, but they are drastic departures in their own right from their
predecessors.
You can learn all about how the Navy ended up with
the design for the Ford class in the video
below. Some of it has aged very poorly, but it
stands as a historical reference as to how this ship design, regardless of its
troubled state, came to be. We plan on doing a post on this video alone in the
future, but it is highly relevant to this article, so enjoy!
Sjekk video her: https://tinyurl.com/yaz6j3au
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.