Dette høres fælt ut. Nå har vi også hørt at A350 har kvalitetsproblemer, noe Airbus sterkt tilbakeviser, men det er lett å forstå Qantas som går for Airbus fremfor Boeing. (Red.)'
WHISTLEBLOWERS
CONDEMN FAA OVERSIGHT OF BOEING AIRCRAFT
written by Isabella Richards | December 15, 2021
Safety oversights and concerns have been raised in a
newly revealed whistleblower report in regard to the Federal Aviation
Administration’s certification process of Boeing aircraft.
The report criticises that there is significant
pressure to approve designs that may not apply with FAA standards, in the wake
of the 737 MAX crashes that killed 346 passengers in 2018-19.
The 20-month groundings from 2019 following the fatal
crashes have continued to raise scrutiny on Boeing and the FAA’s safety
measures, even after recertification.
The committee on commerce, science, and transportation
report called on Steve Dickson, the administrator of the FAA to review what was
said by the seven key industry leader whistleblowers.
According to the whistleblowers, unit members on
behalf of the Organization Designation Authorization (ODA), they were pressured
to accommodate accelerated schedule demand at the expense of a thorough review
of any design.
The ODA unit enables the FAA to grant “designee
authority” to organisations and companies.
It created “a risk that products will be produced that fall short of FAA safety standards”, according to the report.
Some whistleblowers said that when designs were
submitted for approval by the FAA, engineers who found them to be non-compliant
could be overruled by managers.
According to Dr Martin Bickeböller, who has been a Boeing employee since 1987, there were numerous supply chain issues with the 787 Dreamliner production.
Give the perfect
stocking filler to an aviator and sign them up to the Australian Aviation digital and
print magazine for
high-quality news and features.
Between 2008 to 2011, he served as the technical
fellow for configuration management compliance for the 787 suppliers.
He filed a complaint in 2009 expressing concerns about
wing component defects and fuselage problems and was then removed from the 787
program.
“[The] 787 [project] had a culture of ‘making it
happen’,” he said in the interview for the committee report.
“It became clear, that in many instances, Boeing
management was more interested in a quick resolution without root cause
corrective actions.”
The report also highlighted staffing issues and said
the Boeing Aviation Safety Oversight Office has been “chronically
understaffed,” impeding on its ability to perform efficient oversights.
“Together, these allegations illustrate the importance
of a course correction that puts safety first and listens to the voices of line
engineers,” US Senator Maria Cantwell, chair of the committee said.
“In recognition of the whistleblowers’ important
information sharing, I request that you review each allegation thoroughly, and
where warranted, open an investigation to determine whether conduct is contrary
to FAA policies and procedures.”
The committee recommended that the FAA strengthen its
oversight of the ODA program, address undue pressures and improve safety
culture for frontline staff.
The committee expects to hold an additional hearing
next year in anticipation for the FAA’s reauthorisation in 2023, Senator
Cantwell added.
The FAA said it “takes all whistleblower allegations
seriously and does not tolerate retaliation against those who raise safety
concerns”.
It comes only months after Boeing was investigated by
the FAA to determine whether the
company’s culture led to the concealment of safety problems in fear of repercussions from
executives in August.
Out of the employees interviewed, 35 per cent of them
voiced concerns indicating the “environment does not support” the authority of
the ODA unit.
In response to the
committee paper, Boeing said it was reviewing the report, and staff are
“encouraged to speak up whenever they have safety or quality concerns”.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.