Trump's Awful Decision
to Gut Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Trump is destroying a valuable source of American
"soft power" and an inspiration to people suffering under
authoritarian regimes.
Ilya Somin | 3.16.2025
12:51 PM
(RFE/RL)
Trump's order is a blow to America's "soft
power" and to dissidents battling anti-American authoritarian regimes.
VOA, RFE/RL and other similar media are among the few federal programs whose
value far exceeds the money expended on them.
During the Cold War, millions of people living under communist regimes listened to these networks, and got news and analysis that countered regime propaganda. These media helped inspire dissident movements, and the eventual overthrow of communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe in 1989-91. My own parents were among the many Soviet citizens who clandestinely listened to VOA broadcasts, and it helped solidify their opposition to the regime.
In more recent years, VOA and RFE/RL operate on the internet as much or more than
on traditional radio. But they continue to be valuable resources for dissidents
and others living under authoritarian regimes, such as those of Russia and
Belarus. Radio Free Asia and Radio Marti provide similar services for China and
Cuba, respectively.
Shutting these programs down is an obvious boon to
dictators like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. As Russian opposition leader
Vladimir Kara-Murza puts it, Trump's EO
is "One more
champagne bottle opened in the Kremlin." It is, sadly, of a piece with the
Trump Administration's increasing estrangement from other liberal democracies,
and alignment with despots like Putin.
Nor can it be said that the order will save any
significant amount of money. The annual budget of the US Agency for Global
Media (USAGM), which oversees all these broadcasters, is only about $950 million, barely a rounding error in the $7 trillion federal budget. For that
small investment, we significantly weaken some of America's principal enemies
by bolstering internal opposition to their regimes. We thereby also augment the
"soft power" of the appeal of American liberal democracy.
Since 2014, I have often been an (unpaid) guest
commentator on Russian-language RFE/RL, and a few times on VOA. I was
proud to do it, as a small partial repayment of the debt I and others owe to
these organizations.
One of the strengths of RFE/RL and VOA is that
they have a measure of editorial independence from the administration in power.
Thus, they often have commentators critical of various aspects of US policy.
For example, in my very first RFE/RL interview, back in 2014, I criticized the Obama Administration for usurping
Congress' war powers. In later appearances, I was also critical of Trump and
Biden on various issues. Obviously, RFE/RL and VOA often host defenders of the
administration in power, as well. When I appeared, it was often together with
another expert advocating the opposite view. But the willingness to host
critics strengthens these outlets' credibility with the target audience, and
provides it with valuable lessons on how a free media operates.
This editorial independence may well be what
attracted Trump's ire. A few days ago, he became
angry when a VOA reporter
(correctly) pointed out that Trump had advocated expelling the civilian
population of Gaza. Although Trump denied it, he had in fact previously
advocated exactly that. It may be no accident that the EO targeting VOA came
just two days later.
Regardless of Trump's motives, the apparent
shuttering of VOA and RFE/RL is a blow to people living under oppression and a
needless gift to America's enemies. With measures such as this and the betrayal of Ukraine, Trump's foreign policy is making anti-American authoritarians great
again.
NOTE: As indicated above, I have been a guest
commentator on Russian-language RFE/RL and VOA. As also noted, this is an
unpaid role. However, cynics might still argue I am only opposed to Trump's
order because it somehow hurts my career. The truth of the matter is that
appearing on Russian-language media does little or nothing for my career,
because hardly any of the people with influence over my career prospects
(mostly other US law professors0 follow such media or even know Russian. I
appeared on these programs as a (very small) public service because I am one of
the few Russian speakers available to them who have relevant expertise on the
kinds of law and policy issues they interviewed me about.
----oooo00O00oooo----
Jeg får dessverre bare med meg overskriften som er veldig skremmende. (Red.)
Trump v the spies of Five Eyes
Will the
president damage the world’s most powerful intelligence pact?
Photograph:
AP
Mar 16th 2025
ON MARCH 2ND Tulsi
Gabbard, America’s director of national intelligence,
accused Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s president, of seeking a third world war “or
even a nuclear war”. Ms Gabbard has a long history of conspiratorial and
pro-Russian views. Her former aides say that she routinely read and shared
propaganda published by RT, a Kremlin mouthpiece.





Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.