Jeg tar med denne nyheten siden typen er under vurdering som nytt hær-helikopter her hjemme (Red.)
The Senate is calling for additional Sikorsky [LMT]
HH-60G Pave Hawk combat search and rescue helicopters (CSAR) for the Air
National Guard to account for delays in the HH-60W Combat Rescue Helicopter
program and planned replacements of HH-60Gs lost in combat.
“It is the sense of Congress that, given delays to
Operational Loss Replacement (OLR) program fielding and the on-time fielding of
Combat Rescue Helicopter (CRH), the Air National Guard should retain additional
HH–60G helicopters at Air National Guard locations to meet their recommended
primary aircraft authorized (PAA) per the Air Force’s June 2018 report on Air
National Guard HH–60 requirements,” according to the report on the Senate’s version
of the fiscal 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the version that
passed the Senate on June 27 with a vote of 86 to 8.
For its part, Sikorsky said that the HH-60W Combat
Rescue Helicopter program is on schedule.
Greg Hames, director of the Combat Rescue Helicopter
program at Sikorsky, said that CRH “is on track to achieve the Objective
Milestone C date in September, per the Acquisition Program Baseline schedule.”
“The HH-60W flight test program continues to progress
with two aircraft in flight test,” he said. “Since first flight was achieved on
May 17, we have accumulated over 35 hours of test flights and envelope
expansion activities. These flight test aircraft are beginning to enter the
data collection phase for the Milestone C decision. A third and fourth aircraft
will enter flight test in late summer.”
The Senate calls for the Air Force Secretary to submit
a report within 45 days of the passage of the NDAA conference measure. That
report, the Senate advises, should include a “description of the differences in
capabilities between the HH–60G, OLR, and CRH helicopters, a description of the
costs and risks associated with changing the CRH fielding plan to reduce or
eliminate inventory shortfalls, a description of the measures for accelerating
the program available within the current contract, a description of the
operational risks and benefits associated with fielding the CRH to the
active component first, including how the differing fielding plan may affect
deployment schedules; what capabilities active-component units deploying
with the CRH will have that reserve component units deploying with OLR will
not; and an analysis of the potential costs and benefits that could result from
accelerating CRH fielding to all units through additional funding in the future
years defense program.”
Three years ago, the Air Force introduced the first of
the HH-60G Pave Hawk OLR helicopters at a Huntsville, Alabama,
ceremony. The OLR program replaces Pave Hawks lost in combat since 2001.
“The Air Force is converting 19 Army UH-60L
helicopters to the USAF HH-60G configuration, enhancing mission capability for
rescue operations by bringing the HH-60G fleet back up to 112 aircraft,” the
Air Force said last year. “During fiscal year 2018, the OLR team resolved two
major developmental testing deficiencies delaying entry into operational
testing, and delivered the second developmental testing aircraft, clearing the
path for full quantity delivery in fiscal year 2019/2020.”
The Pentagon’s Director of Test and Evaluation report
for 2018 weapon testing noted several deficiencies relating to CRH
survivability, but Sikorsky has said that the program has either corrected or
is in the process of certifying fixes for those problems — dealing with the crew
seats, the rescue hoist, ballistic performance and the gun mount design for the FN
Herstal-built machine guns.
The company said that it has addressed all but the gun
mount redesign for CRH, that the program is back on schedule, and that the
company has cut five months off the time it should take to ready the aircraft
for production.
As of May last year, the Air Force had 82 primary
mission and backup Pave Hawks, as well as 12 training HH-60Gs and two
developmental and testing aircraft.
While active Air Force units are to begin receiving
HH-60Ws in fiscal 2020, Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard units are not
to receive them until fiscal 2026 and 2027, respectively.
“According to Air Force officials, the Combat Rescue
Helicopter fielding schedule, which was included in the contract for the new
helicopters, was designed to ensure that helicopters with the highest flying
hours are generally replaced first,” according to Air Force Plans to Replace Aging
Personnel Recovery Helicopter Fleet, a report last August by the
Government Accountability Office.
“The officials told us that this is why the active
component units, which have higher flying-hour averages, would begin receiving
their new Combat Rescue Helicopters in fiscal year 2020,” the report said.
“Based on the current Combat Rescue Helicopter fielding schedule, the Air Force
Reserve is scheduled to receive its new helicopters beginning in fiscal year
2026. The Air National Guard is scheduled to receive refurbished Operational
Loss Replacement helicopters in fiscal year 2019 and the new Combat Rescue
Helicopters beginning in fiscal year 2027. The last Combat Rescue Helicopters
are scheduled to be fielded to all three components in fiscal year 2029.”
The National Guard Association of the United States
has said that Air National Guard Pave Hawks “have been in high demand both at
home and abroad” and that “many of them suffer the same significant structural
and mechanical issues that plague those in the active component.”
“To make the Guard squadrons wait until the active
component and the Reserve are fully equipped is unacceptable,” the association
said.
Most Pave Hawks, which entered service in 1982, have
passed the expected flying life of 6,000 hours, and those in the active
component average about 2,000 more flight hours than those in the reserve
component.
The Air Force has said that the refurbished Army
helicopters for the ORL program have about 3,000 fewer flying hours than the
Guard’s current aircraft.
“The Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard did not
concur with the Combat Rescue Helicopter fielding schedule,” according to the
GAO report last August. “Reserve component officials said they did not concur,
in part, because the Air Force did not coordinate the fielding schedule prior
to the contract’s approval in 2014. However, according to headquarters Air
Force officials, the Combat Rescue Helicopter fielding schedule was coordinated
with and approved by all components prior to the 2014 contract being approved.
Further, Air Force officials stated they plan to maintain the fielding schedule
because changing it would require the renegotiation of the contract and would
likely result in increased costs and possibly a delay in delivery of the new
helicopters.”
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.