Boeing Phantom Works
Chief Engineer Talks Next Generation Rotorcraft Capabilities
By Kelsey Reichmann | January 21,
2021
Send Feedback
NATO, NGRC, NIAG, Rotorcraft
The North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) will be focusing on cost, timeline, sustainment,
interoperability, and regulatory approvals when developing the requirements for
its Next Generation Rotorcraft Capabilities (NGRC). The shift in focus was influenced
by collaboration with industry through the NATO Industry Advisory Group (NIAG).
The NIAG is a high-level consultative body of senior industrialists from NATO allied and partner nations who advises NATO on key issues within the industrial and technological base.
“What I think is unique about NIAG is that this is an opportunity for industry to get in the same room and collaborate on the future,” Dan Newman, senior technical fellow and chief engineer for Phantom Works Advanced Vertical Lift at Boeing, said during the Royal Aeronautical Society’s Next Generation Rotorcraft Conference on Jan. 20. “At least in the U.S., when the military service does an integration, they talk to each of the industry representatives and then do the integration about what the future ought to be. But they are limited because they are talking to them individually and with proprietary interests at stake there is a challenge sharing any company's information with others.”
The NGRC will replace
an aging fleet of rotorcraft set to retire in the next 10 to 20 years.
NIAG started
completing study groups on NGRC capabilities in 2017 and has completed three
looking at NGR capabilities, integrated sustainability, and innovated military
aviation acquisition.
The NIAG Study Group
SG-219 focused on a concept of operations for equipment for NGRC. This group
included 33 companies from 14 different countries. It was out of this group
which the NIAG decided to focus on reducing life cycle costs, improving safety,
and enhancing capabilities, interoperability, and sustainability, Newman said.
“We were going to
consider the issues common to all platforms because we were looking at
replacing the entire fleet of 1,000 aircraft, perhaps up to 2,000, and we
couldn't focus on any one mission,” Newman said. “So, what did we focus on? We
focused on cost and schedule. We focused on operability. We focused on
sustainment. And we focused on regulatory approval, and that was important
because of the regulatory issues.”
To achieve those
goals, the NIAG suggested the NGR having a modular design with multiple levels
of capability so different nations could procure the capabilities they
required, Newman said. They also suggested rotorcraft be designed with
condition-based operations (CBO) for dynamic planning purposes.
“So not just a modular
aircraft, but a modular design and development a modular acquisition
process…this modularity allows you to change the avionics and the mission
equipment every five years, and not have to wait until a 20-year lifecycle
upgrade,” Newman said.
Newman said they also
focused on capabilities being qualified and certified from day one so NATO
would have acquisition and operational freedoms.
NIAG is suggesting the
NATO NGRC move toward unmanned maintenance solutions to increased maintainability,
Newman said. Reducing manned solutions can also reduce program costs and risks.
“We've been moving
toward unmanning the maintenance battalion, as opposed to just unmanned in the
aircraft,” Newman said. “So, this unmanned needs to be extended expanded beyond
takeoff through landing that needs to be include landing through takeoff.”
Newman said NATO is
also working on putting out requirements for NGRC that will include
capabilities like speed, range, payload, and endurance while also taking into
account the capabilities the NIAG is suggesting as well.
“The goal was to move
from speeches and briefings like this one to requirements documents because if
it doesn't get into the requirements document, it will not be part of the
system,” Newman said. ‘Again, if it doesn't get into the requirements, no one
will offer it. And so, speeches and articles are good, but the requirements are
the pull and the draw.”
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.