Some
787 Production Test Records Were Falsified, Boeing Says
Sean Broderick May
06, 2024
Credit: Sean Broderick/AWST
Boeing must inspect undelivered and in-production
787s to ensure some steps in the aircraft’s assembly were done correctly after
learning that required tests to validate the work were recorded as complete but
never conducted.
A Boeing employee
in the company’s South Carolina 787 final assembly facility “saw what appeared
to be an irregularity in a required conformance test in wing-body join,” Scott
Stocker, 787 vice president & general manager said in an April 29 email to
employees that revealed the issue. The employee told his manager, who alerted
“executive leadership,” the email said.
Boeing “quickly reviewed the matter” and determined
“several people had been violating company policies by not performing a
required test, but recording the work as having been completed.”
The
manufacturer also “promptly” told the FAA, Stocker said.
Boeing “voluntarily informed us in April that it
may not have completed required inspections to confirm adequate bonding and
grounding where the wings join the fuselage on certain 787 Dreamliner
airplanes,” the agency said. “The FAA is investigating whether Boeing completed
the inspections and whether company employees may have falsified aircraft
records.”
Stocker said
the required inspection “now needs to be conducted out of sequence on airplanes
in the build process.” Checks will likely be required for the in-service fleet,
but Boeing said it determined the issue does not pose
any immediate safety risk.
“Boeing is
reinspecting all 787 airplanes still within the production system and must also
create a plan to address the in-service fleet,” the FAA said.
The
immediate ramifications on delivery schedules is not clear. The re-checks “will
impact our customers and factory teammates, because the test now needs to be
conducted out of sequence on airplanes in the build process,” Stocker said.
Stocker’s
email, revealed publicly May 6 following a Wall Street Journal story, lauded
the employee for coming forward. The issue is an example of “the kind of
behavior we will and will not accept as a team,” the email added.
The incident
provides evidence that Boeing’s emphasis on spotlighting safety issues, even
if they reflect poorly on the company, is paying dividends. It also underscores
how far the company has to go, as falsification of safety-related records is
arguably industry’s most egregious non-operational regulatory violation.
“It brings
the entire production certificate (PC) into question,” said one former FAA
official with extensive aircraft certification experience. “A PC is really an
expression of trust. Considering all the [Boeing issues] bubbling up ... the FAA may have no
choice but to assume the falsification is widespread.”
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.