Helikopter / Tilt Rotor

Boeing lands Chinook without a pilot at the controls

Boeing used its A2X software to autonomously guide an Army CH-47 Chinook through its final approach and landing. Read More ----oooo00O00oooo----

 Uncertainty abounds for the US Army's aviation plans

Three days of briefings, strategy sessions and industry expositions at the annual US Army aviation conference in Nashville last week have raised more questions than answers about the service’s long-term aviation strategy.

We now know that Bell’s new MV-75 tiltrotor will be called the Cheyenne II – a monicker that was bestowed with the permission of leaders from the Northern and Southern branches of the Cheyenne tribes, who joined army officials for a ceremonial dedication of a full-scale MV-75 model Nashville.

However, we still don’t know how many of those aircraft the army will ultimately buy.

Originally envisioned as a replacement for the Sikorsky UH-60, top aviation generals now say the US Army will operate the two types side-by-side for the next 50 years or more – meaning far fewer Cheyenne IIs will likely be procured than the 2,300 Black Hawks currently in the army inventory.

Senior generals who last year touted plans to accelerate the tiltrotor fielding and potentially begin operator evaluation flights in 2027 have retired or been fired by Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth. While Bell says it is preparing to begin final assembly of the initial MV-75 test aircraft, company officials tell FlightGlobal they are still planning for a 2030 delivery of frontline tiltrotors, following a lengthy ground and aerial test programme.

Exactly how the Cheyenne II will be integrated into the army’s formations also remains a matter of debate.

Bell's MV-75 has gained the service name Cheyenne II. Source: US Army

The tiltrotors are designed to fly faster and further than any of the US Army's other rotorcraft, raising questions about logistics support and operational collaboration with other aircraft. Senior leaders say they are now considering adding an aerial refuelling capability to the army’s conventional MV-75 fleet – a feature that was previously only being looked at for a special operations variant.

“We're also looking at air refuel as a built-in capability for all of the aircraft,” says Brigadier General David Phillips, deputy portfolio acquisition executive for aviation.

Bell designed the standard MV-75 to allow for the easy addition of a refuelling probe – a standard requirement for special operations rotorcraft – so such a change would presumably not add a significant delay to the development process.

Major General Clair Gill, chief of the army’s aviation branch confirms prior statements that an MV-75 variant being considered by US Special Operations Command will include a refuelling probe.

While special mission aviators from the army’s 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment get tanker support from the US Air Force’s Lockheed Martin MC-130Js, the army itself has no dedicated refuelling aircraft.

“If we put that on a conventional variant, then how do we refuel it?” Gill asks. “So we're thinking through, do we need to develop a requirement for aerial refuelling for ourselves, now that we have really enhanced our capability?”

A promotional video and sub-scale models on display at Bell’s stand at the Army Aviation Association of America conference showed MV-75s with a short aerial refuelling probe on the nose. In the rendered video, one of the tiltrotors completed probe-and-drogue refuelling behind an uncrewed tanker drone resembling the Boeing MQ-25 being developed for the US Navy.

A separate presentation by US Army Special Operations Aviation Command also featured a rendering of an MV-75 with a larger probe.

While Gill points out that such a capability would significantly enhance the army’s combat projection and improve the flexibility of logistics, creating an aerial refuelling capability out of thin air represents a massive (and likely costly) undertaking for a service already struggling with budget constraints.

Those fiscal challenges continue to manifest elsewhere in the army’s aviation enterprise.

The service plans to auction off older UH-60Ls to support the purchase of more new-build UH-60Ms. Older Boeing AH-64D attack helicopters will also be divested, while remanufactured AH-64Es are still being procured.

Meanwhile, army leaders are softening on previous commitments to pursue a full-scale fielding of the latest Block II version of Boeing CH-47F Chinook heavy-lift helicopter. Phillips says the army will now pause Block II purchases at 24 aircraft and give frontline troops a chance to test out the new version of the tandem-rotor transport before it places further orders.

The situation highlights the challenge facing army leaders, who want to support its major rotorcraft suppliers, while also cutting costs and investing in new technologies. Phillips says the army is working with Sikorsky, Boeing and Bell to maintain stability through a combination of domestic and export orders.

“We’re in real time discussions with all three sets of industry partners to ensure that we’re setting that up appropriately to capture all that demand, plus opportunities for any army procurements that we have from the divestiture of the UH-60 Limas,” he says.