fredag 31. mars 2017

Helikopter - Dramatisk video av havari i en "preventable accident", slik FAA uttrykker det - Curt Lewis


Flight For Life helicopter crash in Frisco that killed pilot was caused by hydraulic issue, NTSB finds
  • Pilot Patrick Mahany, of Silverthorne, had started as a Flight for Life pilot in 1987
The July 2015 crash in Frisco of a Flight for Life helicopter that left the pilot dead and two passengers seriously hurt was probably caused by a preventable hydraulic issue that stemmed from a preflight maintenance check, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday.


Federal investigators also found that the fiery crash was survivable, but that since the helicopter wasn't equipped with a crash-resistant fuel system, a post-impact blaze made it lethal.

The NTSB also said that if the pilot, 64-year-old Patrick Mahany, had completed a "hover check" - as is procedure - while lifting off from the ground, "he would have identified the (hydraulic issue) at an altitude that could have afforded a safe landing."

The NTSB released its findings during a hearing in Washington, D.C. The helicopter reached an estimated altitude of about 100 feet before it went down and immediately burst into flames, all in about 30 seconds.

Mahany, of Silverthorne, had started as a Flight for Life pilot in 1987. He served as a scout helicopter pilot in the Vietnam War in 1971 and was awarded the Bronze Star and Purple Heart.

Paramedic and flight nurse David Repsher and flight nurse Matthew Bowe were critically hurt in the July 3, 2015, crash. Attorneys for the pair say Repsher had 90 percent of his body burned in the post-crash fire while Bowe suffered severe internal injuries and permanent disabilities.

The two have sued the helicopter's operator, Air Methods Corporation; the manufacturer, Airbus Helicopters S.A.S; and the distributor, Airbus Helicopters. The helicopter that crashed was an AS350 that was built in 2013.

According to the NTSB, the crash stemmed from a preflight hydraulic check in which Mahany turned off a switch, cutting hydraulic pressure to the tail rotor hydraulic circuit.

Federal investigators say they determined he "most likely did not return the ... switch to its 'On' position before takeoff, resulting in no hydraulic pressure in both the tail rotor servo control and the yaw load compensator accumulator, a lack of hydraulic boost to the pedals and significantly increased pedal loads."

A video shows the helicopter lifting off and then yawing - or twisting - to the left nearly one full rotation before rising out of view. The craft, still out of view, continued rotating counterclockwise several times and, about 30 seconds later and back in view, crashed into a nearby recreational vehicle. The aircraft then burst into flames as its mangled wreckage was strewn across a parking lot.

The NTSB says it found several safety issues that, if addressed, could have prevented the crash, including a lack of a cockpit warning to alert the pilot of the hydraulic issue. The agency also said there is a need for changes in the helicopter's tail rotor flight controls to "ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance" in the case of pilot error.

Federal investigators also highlighted that, going forward, the type of Airbus helicopter involved in the crash needs to have better crash-worthiness protections, including spill-resistant fuel tanks. Most choppers certified after 1994 were required to have fuel system protections, but because of a loophole, the accident helicopter was not, the NTSB says.

After the crash, the NTSB issued a safety recommendation to the Federal Aviation Administration to require that all newly manufactured helicopters have crash-resistant fuel systems. The FAA is still working to implement the regulation, officials say.

"This accident involved multiple issues that together led to the results we have before us today," Acting NTSB Chairman T. Bella Dinh-Zarr said in presenting the agency's findings. "It is likely the helicopter's system that provides boost to the pedals was misconfigured prior to takeoff. The design of the accident helicopter did not provide an alert to the pilot of this misconfiguration."

NTSB's recommendations

To the FAA:

Require that existing Airbus Helicopters dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters be equipped with a visual and an aural alert for the loss of hydraulic boost to the pedal controls, which would result in increased pedal loads.
Require operators of Airbus Helicopters dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters to incorporate changes to the dual hydraulic system to both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot error during any check of the hydraulic system.
To Airbus Helicopters:

For newly manufactured dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters, assess and implement changes to the dual hydraulic system that would both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot error during any check of the hydraulic system.
For existing dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters, assess and implement changes to the dual hydraulic system that would both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot error during any check of the hydraulic system.
To the Association of Critical Care Transport:

In collaboration with the Association of Air Medical Services and the Air Medical Operators Association, establish a working group to develop and distribute guidelines, for those who purchase, lease and contract for helicopters, regarding the equipment and systems that would enhance the helicopters' crashworthiness, including, at a minimum, a crash-resistant fuel system and energy-absorbing seats.
To the Association of Air Medical Services and the Air Medical Operators Association:

Work with the Association of Critical Care Transport to establish a working group to develop and distribute guidelines, for those who purchase, lease and contract for helicopters, regarding the equipment and systems that would enhance the helicopters' crash worthiness, including, at a minimum, a crash-resistant fuel system and energy absorbing seats.

Australia og Beechcraft B200 Super King Air havariet - Oppdatering - Curt Lewis


Essendon DFO plane crash: Transport safety bureau finds no evidence of engine failure

There is no evidence to suggest the plane that crashed into a Melbourne shopping centre last month experienced "pre-impact" engine failure or had pre-existing faults, a preliminary report says.

Key points:
  • Investigation found no aircraft faults that could have caused crash
  • Pilot made mayday call, but voice recorder failed
  • Witnesses said take-off took "longer than normal"
  • The preliminary Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) report also revealed that pilot Max Quartermain made a distress call to the Essendon air traffic control tower soon after take-off, repeating the word "mayday" seven times.

Four American tourists and Mr Quartermain died when the Beechcraft B200 Super King Air plane crashed into the DFO shopping centre at Essendon, in Melbourne's north, on February 21.

The crash was described as Victoria's worst civil aviation accident in 30 years, but investigators have not determined what caused the plane to plunge into the back of shops and a car park opposite the busy Tullamarine Freeway.

An overview of the crash site after a plane smashed into the DFO shopping centre at Essendon.
PHOTO: An overview of the plane crash site at the DFO shopping centre near Essendon Airport. (Supplied: Australian Transport Safety Bureau)


The ATSB report said on-site examination of the wreckage did not identify any pre-existing faults with the aircraft that could have contributed to the accident.

"The examination found that the cores of both engines were rotating and that there was no evidence of pre-impact failure of either engine's internal components," the report said.
"However a number of engine components were retained for further examination and testing."

Recorded air traffic control radio calls revealed that the pilot broadcast a mayday call before the crash.

"The pilot repeated the word 'MAYDAY' seven times within that transmission," the report said.

"No additional information regarding the nature of the emergency was broadcast."

An image shows the times, altitudes and speeds of the plane that crashed into the DFO shopping centre in Essendon.

Jason Middleton, an aviation expert from the University of New South Wales, said no conclusions were drawn in such preliminary reports because more evidence could later be found.

"There are other possible explanations for the fact that the engines may still appear to be operable," Professor Middleton said.
"For example, there could've been a fuel supply problem.

"That means either contaminated fuel or insufficient [fuel] or fuel pump failures or something of that nature."

Take-off took 'longer than normal': witnesses

The weather conditions were fine when the plane took off from Essendon Airport en route to King Island, Tasmania.

The ATSB report said witnesses reported the take-off roll along the runway was "longer than normal".

"That is an indication that something wasn't perfectly correct," Professor Middleton said.

"The runway at Essendon is 1,500 metres long and it looks like, from the report, that the aircraft left the ground with approximately 400 metres of runway, which meant it had used up 1,100 metres of runway.

"That is probably much longer than normal."

After becoming airborne, the nose of the plane moved to the left, according to witnesses.

Airservices Australia data indicated the plane reached a maximum height of about 49 metres above ground level while tracking in an arc to the left of the runway before crashing.

The landing gear was extended and locked in place.

The report also said there was no audio recording of the incident because the cockpit voice recorder failed.

That failure is also under investigation.

"Every company has a standard checklist for every airplane and there's no reason not to have the cockpit voice recorder on if you have it available," Professor Middleton said.

"That's not suggestive of a pilot failure, maybe it wasn't working.

"Not having that information doesn't help of course, because whilst there was a single pilot, he may have been mumbling to himself while he was doing what he was doing."

The ATSB has identified 12 areas for further investigation.

Areas for further investigation:
  • Examination of propellers, angle of blades at impact
  • Examination of engine, airframe components
  • Further interviews with witnesses
  • Analysis of witness reports
  • Review of plane's maintenance, operational records
  • Review of the weather conditions
  • Review of the approval of the shopping mall
  • Analysis of aircraft performance and other operational factors
  • Review of the pilot's medical and flying history
  • Review of operating processes, approvals
  • Determining the reason for the cockpit voice recorder failure
  • Further analysis of recorded information
Chris Cowan, the chief executive of Essendon Fields - which includes Essendon Airport and the shopping centre - said the interim report had clarified some key facts.

He said much of the speculation about the cause had been "wrong" and "not appropriate".

There had been criticism that an airport should not be located in a densely populated area, and the ATSB is continuing to examine the planning approval of the shopping centre.

However, Mr Cowan said the accident "could have happened at any airport in the world".

"It's a reality of modern society that airports operate in close proximity to urban environments," Mr Cowan said.

"Airport land use and air space planning always includes CASA [Civil Aviation Safety Authority] and Air Services approvals, based upon internationally accepted approaches."

Branson reklamerer for fly laget av grafen - Curt Lewis

I januar 2016 hadde Teknisk Ukeblad en artikkel om dette vidunderstoffet. (Red.)

Graphene is aviation's future: Branson

UK billionaire entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson. File photo.

UK billionaire entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson has raised the prospect of planes being made entirely from the so-called wonder material, graphene, within 10 years, as the airline industry labours under a 50% increase in fuel in the past year, sparking a desperate need for lighter fleets.

The Virgin Atlantic president described the super-lightweight material as a "breakthrough technology" which, he said, could help revolutionise the airline industry and transform its cost base.

Speaking in Seattle, where Virgin has just begun flights on a daily basis, Branson said: "Graphene is even lighter [than carbon fibre], many times lighter and many times stronger.

"Hopefully graphene can be the planes of the future.10 years down the line. They would be massively lighter than the current planes, which again would make a difference on fuel burn."

Graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms forming a regular hexagonal pattern and is extracted from graphite. It has a litany of uses and is said to be as light as a feather yet stronger than steel.

The entrepreneur likened the push for graphene planes to urging Airbus and Boeing to make planes from carbon fibre, a battle he won.

Boeing's latest 787 Dreamliner planes, which Virgin is flying on the London Heathrow-Seattle route, are made from 50% carbon fibre and other composite materials, as opposed to the traditional 100% aluminium. They use 30% less fuel than their standard alternatives.

Lap tops og safety vs. security - ICAO og Transport Canada - Curt Lewis


U.N. aviation agency urges balance of security risk, safety in electronics ban

FILE PHOTO - A Transportation Safety Administration agent looks over a passenger at San Francisco International Airport in San Francisco, California February 27, 2015. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

The United Nation's aviation agency on Wednesday urged regulators to weigh security and safety, after the United States and Britain imposed restrictions on several carry-on electronic devices on planes coming from certain airports in Muslim majority countries.

A news statement published by the International Civil Aviation Organization stressed a balance between security "risk" and safety concerns, because "incidents involving devices containing lithium batteries may be more easily mitigated in the cabin than in checked baggage."

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said passengers traveling from 10 airports in the Middle East and North Africa could no longer bring devices larger than a mobile phone such as a laptop into the main cabin, following reports that militant groups want to smuggle explosive devices inside electronic gadgets.

A spokesman for British Prime Minister Theresa May later said there would also be curbs requiring electronic items to be transported as checked baggage on flights from six countries in the Middle East.

The carry-on ban, while addressing security concerns, has some authorities worried about technical safety risks, such as lithium-powered goods catching fire in the hold.

"Finding an effective balance between safety and security approaches is always a priority in global aviation," the ICAO statement said.

While Montreal-based ICAO cannot impose rules, it sets safety and security standards for international aviation that are usually followed by the organization's 191 member countries.

In 2016, ICAO announced a prohibition on shipments of lithium-ion batteries as cargo on passenger planes. Industry experts are now working to develop new and improved packaging standards that could be used to safely transport these batteries on planes.

While lithium-powered consumer items like laptops are permitted in checked baggage, some ICAO staff have shared safety concerns with countries that are implementing or considering the electronics carry-on ban, said a source close to the aviation agency.

ICAO has not decided whether to propose turning the carry-on electronics ban into a global standard, a second source said.

Both sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to talk to the media.

"ICAO and its member states will continue to review the evolving aviation security environment in the coming weeks," the statement said.

Canada dispatches team to Brussels to assess airplane laptop threat

Transport Minister Marc Garneau has sent a team of officials to Brussels to assess intelligence information before deciding whether Canada should require passengers travelling from some Middle Eastern countries to pack all large electronic devices other than cellphones in their checked baggage.

The United States and Britain have ruled that only cellphones and smartphones will be allowed in the passenger cabin of flights into the U.S. and Britain from a number of Muslim-majority countries.

U.S. Homeland Secretary John Kelly passed on intelligence to Mr. Garneau in a telephone discussion on March 20 after the U.S. banned laptops on passenger aircraft arriving from 10 airports in eight countries.

Canadian security agencies and Transport Canada assessed the intelligence and are now seeking further clarification.

"My officials are in Brussels to attend meetings with a core group of allies and experts on the issue of banned electronics in the cabin of aircraft. We are carefully assessing information of concern with partners," Mr. Garneau said in a statement.

No details have been provided on why the U.S. and Great Britain became alarmed about laptops on passenger planes, but it was reported by The New York Times that intelligence showed Islamic State is developing a bomb hidden in portable electronics.

Mr. Garneau assured Canadians that their safety should not be a concern at this time.

"We have in place enhanced and targeted security measures for flights destined to Canada in airports and countries around the world. This is normal practice, and such measures are in effect on almost every continent, including South America, Asia and Africa," he said. "Our government remains vigilant in continuously assessing our security measures and will not hesitate to take further action when needed."

U.S. officials have told Reuters the information gleaned from a U.S. commando raid in January in Yemen that targeted al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) included bomb-making techniques.

AQAP, based in Yemen, has plotted to take down U.S. airliners and claimed responsibility for the 2015 attack on the office of Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris.

The group claimed responsibility for a Dec. 25, 2009, failed attempt by a Nigerian Islamist to down an airliner over Detroit. The device, hidden in the underwear of the man, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, failed to detonate.

The U.S. ban affects flights from international airports in Jordan, Kuwait, Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Qatar and United Arab Emirates. About 50 flights a day will be impacted, all on foreign carriers.

Britain's ban applies to domestic and foreign flights coming from Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Tunisia and Saudi Arabia.

Of the nine airlines affected by the U.S. ban, eight offer direct routes to Canada, through either Toronto's Pearson International Airport or Montreal's Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport.

If Canada were to follow a similar ban, among the routes affected could be Turkish Airlines flights from Istanbul to Montreal, Royal Jordanian Airlines flights between Amman and Montreal and Qatar Airways flights between Doha and Montreal.

Angela Gittens, director-general of airport association ACI World, likened the move to the years-long restrictions of liquids on planes, which she said also came suddenly, in response to a perceived threat, and caused some disruption.

Airlines will adjust to the electronics policy, she said. "The first few days of something like this are quite problematic, but just as with the liquids ban, it will start to sort itself out."

U.S. officials said the decision had nothing to do with President Donald Trump's efforts to impose a travel ban on six majority-Muslim nations. Homeland Security spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said the government "did not target specific nations. We relied upon evaluated intelligence to determine which airports were affected."

On March 6, President Trump signed a revised executive order barring citizens from Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from travelling to the United States for 90 days. Two federal judges have halted parts of the ban, saying it discriminates against Muslims. Mr. Trump has vowed to appeal up to the Supreme Court if necessary.

The rules do apply to U.S. citizens travelling on those flights, but not to crew members on those foreign carriers. Homeland Security will allow passengers to use larger approved medical devices.

While Canada assesses the information that led to the U.S. and UK actions, the International Air Transport Association called for the ban to be a temporary measure.

"The current measures are not an acceptable long-term solution to whatever threat they are trying to mitigate," Alexandre de Juniac, director general and chief executive officer of the association said in a speech in Montreal. "Even in the short term it is difficult to understand their effectiveness. And the commercial distortions they create are severe. We call on governments to work with the industry to find a way to keep flying secure without separating passengers from their personal electronics."

Airlines are raising legitimate criticisms of the ban, Mr. de Juniac said.

The two countries have placed the ban on flights from different airports and laptops are regarded as secure in some airplane cabins but not others, he noted.

"We must find a better way. And governments must act quickly," he said.

Gulf airlines offer workarounds to US electronics ban

Persian Gulf airlines have begun loaning laptops and iPads to travelers on U.S.-bound flights, the latest workaround to a new U.S. policy banning large electronics on select flights from the Middle East and Africa.

Qatar Airways will let business-class passengers flying out of the targeted airports use laptops at no charge after boarding and give them one hour of free Wi-Fi, while Etihad Airways will make iPads available for first-class and business-class passengers and provide vouchers for free Wi-Fi.

Qatar Airways is also offering a "handling service" to accommodate passengers that want to use their laptops up until boarding. The service will allow any banned items to be collected at the gate, packed up, loaded onto the plane as checked baggage and returned back to the customer upon arrival to the U.S.

Dubai's Emirates airline announced a similar solution last week.

"As an award-winning and global airline we truly appreciate the importance of being able to work on board our aircraft and that is why I have insisted on offering only the best possible solution for our customers," said Akbar Al Baker, chief executive of Qatar Airways Group. "By providing this laptop loan service we can ensure that our passengers on flights to the US can continue to work whilst on-board."

Middle Eastern airlines, which have worked aggressively to boost their image in the U.S., have been racing to contain the fallout from President Trump's new electronics ban.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced earlier this month that passengers will now be prohibited from carrying electronic devices larger than a cellphone - including laptops, tablets, cameras and portable DVD players - onto the cabins of certain U.S.-bound flights. Those items may be stowed in checked luggage, however.

The indefinite ban applies to 10 different airports in Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, Qatar, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.

While the policy does not target specific nations or airlines, it affects nine overseas air carriers that have a total of 50 daily direct flights to the U.S., according to senior officials. No U.S. airlines are affected because none has direct flights from the select airports.

If the airlines don't comply, they could have their certificate to fly to the U.S. revoked.

Senior administration officials said the new security protocols are being implemented because terrorist groups are "aggressively pursuing innovative methods" to smuggle explosive devices onto commercial flights.

But Gulf carriers are worried about the damage of the electronics ban on their business. Tourists and business travelers often work while they fly and may be reluctant to put expensive electronics with sensitive information in checked baggage, and they may decide to avoid Middle Eastern airports altogether.

The United Kingdom announced a similar rule, but that ban does not affect Emirates, Qatar and Etihad, which have been major industry rivals in the U.S.

Tim Clark, the president of Emirates, told CNN that the security protocols will be "hugely disruptive" for Emirates and he questioned why only some airlines and airports are singled out.

"After all, if these devices are viewed by the United States and the United Kingdom as potential instruments of threat, they can be loaded on any airplane anywhere," Clark said. "To suggest that Dubai doesn't have the equal capabilities or better than the Europeans, the Americans and the Asians in terms of search, interdiction and surveillance, I find amazing."

EASA og safety - Curt Lewis

Dette høres nesten tåpelig ut gitt EASAs reaksjon på to identiske helikopterhavarier. Selv noe så opp i dagen like ulykker velger EASA allikevel å forholde seg mer til helikopterprodusenten enn til vår egen SHT. (Red,)

EASA aims to fine-tune safety-risk analysis
Forty years after the worst accident in civil aviation history, European authorities are transitioning to a new method of assessing safety risk.

Safety performance has typically been monitored through the blunt tool of counting accidents and serious incidents.

But the European Aviation Safety Agency states that this method is "not a good risk measure".

In a preliminary safety review covering 2016 the authority says the accident rate of European-operated commercial air transport has been broadly downwards since 2012, to around three per million flights.

The overall number of accidents last year, 18, was the lowest figure for a decade but, in contrast, the number of serious incidents, more than 100, was the highest in the same period.

"This increase was mainly attributable to occurrences relating to technical failures of aircraft systems, medical, runway excursion and loss of separation," says EASA.

EASA says a new common risk-classification scheme due for implementation this year will "provide a better picture" of safety risks.

The scheme emerged from a European Union directive requiring development, by May 2017, of a mechanism by which necessary rapid action could be identified through analysis of individual safety occurrences.

"Such a scheme should help the relevant entities in their assessment of occurrences and in determining where best to focus their efforts," the directive states.

IATA states that the commercial airline industry's accident rate declined to 1.61 per million flights last year, from the previous level of 1.79.

It released its accident statistics days before the 40th anniversary of the Boeing 747 runway collision in Tenerife in March 1977, which resulted in over 580 fatalities and remains the highest-casualty accident in civil aviation history.

The major jet accident rate increased slightly to 0.39, one of the parameters in which the association acknowledges the industry took a "step back".

But the relative rarity of accidents means that the statistics are easily skewed by individual occurrences, highlighting the need for a more finely-tuned method of analysis.

The European scheme is intended to collate occurrence reports in a format which will facilitate information exchange.

EASA says: "The scheme will help to shift the focus to the probable potential harm of identified hazards to the European aviation system instead of directly measuring the severity of a realised outcome."

Peru havariet - Oppdatering - Curt Lewis video

Accident: Peruvian B733 at Jauja on Mar 28th 2017, hard landing, runway excursion, all gear collapsed, aircraft caught fire

A Peruvian Airlines Boeing 737-300, registration OB-2036-P performing flight P9-112 from Lima to Jauja (Peru) with 141 people on board, landed on Jauja's runway 31 at about 16:40L (21:40Z) but veered off the runway, suffered the collapse of all gear and burst into flames coming to a stop after skidding on fire for some distance. The aircraft was evacuated. There were no injuries, the aircraft received substantial damage beyond repair.

Passengers reported there were two strong impacts upon arrival.

Local media report 29 occupants were taken to hospitals with injuries.

Peru's Ministry of Transport and Communication reported the aircraft OB-2036-P had had a hard landing at Jauja Airport. All passengers and crew were evacuated and are well. A fire has been extinguished in the meantime. The Accident Investigation Commission is going to investigate the accident.

The local public prosecutor reported there were no injuries and no casualties.

Jauja Airport's Elevation is 11,034 feet/3363 meters MSL, the airport offers runway 13/31 of 2810 meters/9220 feet length.

Only METAR available (no further weather data available):
SPJJ 281124Z 00000KT 9999 SCT030 OVC050 09/08 Q1029=

********************


Date: 28-MAR-2017
Time: 16:28
Type:
Boeing 737-3M8
Owner/operator: Peruvian Airlines
Registration: OB-2036-P
C/n / msn: 25071 / 2039
Fatalities: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 141
Other fatalities: 0
Airplane damage: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
Location: Jauja-Francisco Carlé Airport (SPJJ) -    Peru
Phase: Landing
Nature: Domestic Scheduled Passenger
Departure airport: Jorge Chavez International Airport (LIM/SPJC)
Destination airport: Francisco Carlé Airport (JAU/SPJJ)
Narrative:
Peruvian Airlines flight 112 from Lima-Jorge Chavez International departed at 16:03 (local time) on a short domestic flight to Jauja Francisco Carlé Airport in Peru.
After touchdown on runway 31 the airplane apparently veered off the right side of the runway. According to the airport authority, CORPAC, the right hand wing of the aircraft impacted the perimeter fence.
Fuel began leaking from the wing and ignited. The passengers and crew members evacuated safely Whilst the fire spread, consuming a large part of the fuselage.

Sola Airshow - Billetter selges nå

Sjekk billettsalget som begynner i dag her: http://tinyurl.com/kxwvr2v

Forhåndssalget av billetter til Sola Airshow 2017 har startet og kan nå kjøpes på nett hos ticketmaster.no. Kjøper du billetten på nett før 1. juni er du med i trekningen av flyturer med P-51 Mustang, Vampire, Harvard, Norsemann, Saab Safir eller tandemhopp i fallskjerm og billetter til Mods-konserten på Viking Stadion i juni. Info om priser og andre praktiske ting finner du på vår infoside.

Billettpriser per dag:
Kr 265 Voksne
Kr 165 Barn (5 til 15 år)
Kr 680 Familie (2 voksne og to barn)

Ledsager med gyldig ledsagerbevis gratis uten billett.
Barn under 5 år gratis.

Bruk "Bestill nå" knappen for å kjøpe billetter, eller trykk på linken under:
http://www.ticketmaster.no/ar…/sola-airshow-billetter/983304