UNDERWATER AGAIN
The Tracking Problem Continues
By Roger
Rapoport
Contributing
Editor
An FSI
Commentary
As the search continues for Egypt Air 804 and Malaysia Air 370, the
aviation industry confronts an unanticipated problem. Failure to equip planes
with state-of-the-art tracking systems that stream flight details during a
crisis, use of emergency locator beacons transmitting on the wrong frequency for
a deep underwater search and the use of pingers with batteries that last just 30
days is inexcusable.
With search costs for these flights well over $100 million, the
industry can no longer afford to delay long overdue tracking upgrades on all
overwater aircraft. At a price well within the industry's reach, these
modifications well help airlines recover the critical information they need to
prevent more accidents.
Accident investigation reveals critical information that can lead to
software and hardware upgrades as well as better training. A lower accident
rate is no excuse for shortcuts that make it hard to find planes carrying
hundreds of passengers.
How did the airlines wind up in this embarrassing position? Blaming
the whole thing on bean counters misses the point. Yes the airlines are eager
to save money where they can. The broader problem is outmoded group think.
Airlines are reluctant to make a move until the whole industry signs off on that
change. Sometimes that appears to be as hard as charging for parking passing
space ships.
For example it's common knowledge that Angle of Attack indicators,
widely used in the military and on business jets, have been rejected by the
airlines. Although Boeing and Airbus both offer this valuable safety option, no
air carrier is willing to step out ahead of the industry and take a leadership
position. That makes little sense. Why shouldn't Bombardier aircraft flown by
airlines have the same Angle of Attack indicators found on the company's
corporate jets.
It's ironic that an industry committed to moving people around the
world at high speed, operates in slow motion when it comes to important changes
that would benefit the safety of every passenger. Recovering missing aircraft
is not a luxury. It's a critical way to uncover facts that can help prevent
future accidents.
Is there a way to overcome this inertia? One possibility would be for
a progressive carrier to set an example by upgrading tracking and underwater
locator systems in the hope that other carriers would follow. I have three
candidates in mind. They are Air France, Malaysia Air and Egypt Air.
All three of these airlines have learned firsthand over the past
seven years why these long overdue improvements need to be made immediately.
Perhaps they have already begun moving in this direction to make sure that any
aircraft lost at sea can be quickly tracked and located. If so, perhaps they
would like to offer details. If not, let's hope they will move quickly on this
issue.
In the meantime passengers can certainly make their views clear.
There is a big difference between fewer accidents and no accidents. When planes
are lost it's important to find out what went wrong as quickly as possible. In
a worst case scenario regulators can put out airworthiness directives or even
order modifications. Even after aircraft are recovered it can take years to
fully analyze the data. One of the most important outcomes of Air France 447,
revising high altitude approach to stall and stall recovery for every airline,
took seven years.
Even a short tracking delay can rule out the possibility of
recovering survivors on a downed aircraft. Carefully laid out recommendations
from the BEA's Air France 447 report, spell out the need for long overdue
changes on the tracking of overwater flights. The industry would be well
advised to listen to the French experts and make these important changes
now.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.