What
China’s New Missile Test Means
Beijing has played its latest test off as a
space mission, but a more dangerous competition is being launched.
By Colm Quinn, the newsletter writer at Foreign Policy.
A
Long March rocket, reportedly used in an August missile test, carries the
Shenzhou 12 spacecraft and a crew of three astronauts to orbit on June 17. GREG BAKER/AFP
OCTOBER
19, 2021, 5:44 AM
Here is today’s Foreign Policy brief: China denies
hypersonic orbital missile test, Zalmay Khalilzad resigns
as U.S. Afghan envoy, and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visits Ecuador.
If you would like to receive Morning Brief in your
inbox every weekday, please sign up here.
China Denies
Testing New Missile
China has rejected a report from the Financial Times that
described the test launch of a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile that entered
orbit before reaching its final destination.
The missile technology, more accurately known as a fractional
orbital bombardment system, marks the latest advance in China’s weaponry as
Russia and the United States both pursue faster and stealthier weapons systems.
In denying the launch on Monday, China’s foreign ministry said a
“space vehicle,” not a missile, was tested. That explanation may only amount to
semantics as the August launch reportedly involved the deployment of what’s
known as a glide vehicle, which cruises down from space after launch to hit its
target.
The development has already led to a response from China hawks in
Congress, with Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher calling for U.S. divestment from
China in the areas where military and civil technology overlap
to slow China’s progress.
So why are China and Russia pursuing this technology? To make sure
the logic of nuclear deterrence holds, East Asia Nonproliferation Program
director Jeffrey Lewis summed up in Foreign Policy on
Monday: “If the Americans hit us with everything they have, how many of our
nuclear weapons will survive to retaliate? How many of those will get through
U.S. missile defenses? … That’s
it.”
Lewis continues: “If the answer for the foreseeable future is
enough, then great. But if it’s not, then Moscow and Beijing have to do
something about that.”
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.