|
|
Federal judge tosses out Southwest Airlines
pilots' petition against vaccine mandate
A Texas judge on Tuesday dismissed a request for an injunction against an
impending vaccine mandate brought by a union that represents pilots at Southwest
Airlines, a significant blow against their attempt to sidestep President Joe
Biden's mandate for government contractors.
Federal workers and government contractors, which includes major U.S.
commercial airlines, must be vaccinated by Dec. 8.
Background: The Southwest Airlines Pilots Association had last month
unsuccessfully sought exemptions to the mandate, petitioning the administration
to reconsider. They argued that the vaccine could have medical side effects that
could end a pilot's career.
Like its sister airlines, Southwest said its contracts with the federal
government require "full compliance" with the federal vaccination directive.
Employees must be fully vaccinated, or be approved for religious, medical or
disability exemption, by Dec. 8 to continue employment — the same date by which
federal contractors must prove they’ve been vaccinated. When their plea for an
exemption failed, the union then filed an injunction in a Dallas federal court
to temporarily block the vaccine mandate.
Additionally, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott issued an edict that would ban vaccine
mandates for private businesses in the state. Despite Abbott's action, Southwest
said it will still continue to require its employees to get vaccinated per
federal decree.
The ruling: Texas District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn denied SWAPA’s request
for an injunction, stating it was “premature" under the Norris-LaGuardia Act, a
1932 law that gives labor unions the right to organize and strike or use other
economic means to influence management.
SWAPA also had argued that Southwest violated the Railway Labor Act,
alleging the airline failed to maintain a status quo during the ongoing “major”
dispute between the parties. That dispute is a previous lawsuit filed by SWAPA
involving claims of unfair labor practices during Covid. “The Court agrees that
it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the parties’ disputes as to the
complained-of policies,” according to the ruling.
But Lynn said vaccination requirements under the Biden’s administration’s
mandate is a no-brainer: “Requiring Southwest employees to be vaccinated against
COVID-19 will likewise improve the safety of air transportation, the efficiency
of Southwest’s operations, and further the [collective bargaining agreement]’s
goal of safe and reasonable working conditions for pilots. In addition, because
Southwest is a federal contractor, the Vaccine Policy is required by law,” the
judge said.
Situasjonen i United nå
|
|
United says vaccinated pilots and flight
attendants could refuse to fly with unvaccinated coworkers
New York (CNN Business)Almost all employees at United Airlines have
complied with the company's vaccine mandate -- and they do not want to fly with
unvaccinated co-workers, according to the airline.
United (UAL) is facing a federal lawsuit brought by six of its employees
who have applied for a medical or religious exemption to the vaccine mandate.
The airline has said that employees with valid requests for exemptions will be
placed on either medical or unpaid leave. The employees bringing the suit are
challenging the airline's decision to place them on leave.
US Court Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, Texas, has ordered United to
keep employees who have requested an accommodation on the payroll while the case
is heard.
But United said in a court filing last week that it's not practical to
allow them to keep working, because some vaccinated pilots won't fly with
unvaccinated staff. In a separate filing, United said flight attendants have
stated they would hold similar objections to flying with unvaccinated
coworkers.
The company asked for permission to put unvaccinated workers on
leave.
"United cannot return the unvaccinated pilots to the cockpit because —
aside from the various practical problems with testing and masking — we would
face serious and widespread objections from the vaccinated pilots," said Kirk
Limacher, vice president of HR at United, in a court filing. "In fact the
objections among our vaccinated pilots are so strongly held that many of them
would simply refuse to fly with the accommodated pilots. The distractions and
dissension this would cause in the workforce represent an unacceptable safety
risk."
The airline said it is spending about $1.4 million every two weeks to
continue to pay pilots who have requested to be exempt from the mandate, even
though they are not flying. Last month, United said about 2,000 of its 67,000 US
employees, or less than 3%, have applied for a medical or religious exemption.
And only a couple hundred workers now face termination for not getting
vaccinated or requesting an exemption.
Almost all United employees complied with the vaccine mandate
Attorneys for the employees who brought the suit said United's claim is not
backed by any evidence.
"The claim is easily rebutted by showing the instances of vaccinated and
unvaccinated pilots flying together throughout the past nine months," the
plaintiffs' attorneys said in a filing. Even in the last week, the filing
states, United had allowed an unvaccinated pilot to fly and there was no
issue.
The plaintiffs also dispute that the unvaccinated staff who test negative
for Covid-19 would pose a risk to their co-workers.
Vaccinated pilots are "safer flying with an accommodated, unvaccinated
pilot who just tested negative for Covid-19 than with an untested, vaccinated
pilot," the plaintiffs' filing states, because the vaccinated pilot could have a
breakthrough case, even without showing symptoms. The plaintiffs' filing accuses
United of attempting to "ostracize those seeking accommodations."
"Rather than sharing private medical information, United should be
informing its pilots — as they do the general public — that the risk of
contracting Covid-19 on a United airplane is almost zero." United executives,
and executives at other airlines, have insisted since the start of the pandemic
that the exchange of fresh air in cabins during flights make the transmission of
Covid-19 less likely than in stores or other places where people
congregate.
But United CEO Scott Kirby has argued that it isn't practical to allow
testing instead of vaccines because positive or skipped tests could lead to
sudden and unexpected staff shortages and flight cancelations.
Kirby pointed to disruptions experienced by Southwest Airlines which
recently canceled 2,000 flights over the course of a weekend because the airline
didn't have enough available employees to fly the planes.
"Imagine if you have thousands of employees on one day calling in and
saying, 'For some reason, my test didn't pass.' I mean it is going to be a huge
challenge for airlines that are not implementing vaccine requirements," he said
in a call with investors, suggesting that United's passengers can have more
faith that their flights won't be canceled due to its vaccine mandate.
In the end, Judge Pittman decided to extend his temporary restraining
order, meaning United employees who requested accommodations will stay on the
payroll while he continues to hear arguments. Pittman has said in earlier
rulings that his decision is not based on the merits of the case, but on his
desire to maintain the status quo as the case proceeds
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.