American and United happy
to compete with 'clever' Norwegian
02
ARCH, 2017 - SOURCE:
FLIGHTGLOBAL PRO - BY: EDWARD RUSSELL -WASHINGTON DC
Photo: FlightGlobal
American Airlines and United
Airlines are happy to compete with Norwegian’s expansion to the USA, which
their chief executives say is simply using a "clever" business
strategy - and not subsidies - to lower costs.
“[Norwegian’s] not being
subsidised doing what they do,” says Oscar Munoz, chief executive of United,
on the sidelines of the US Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit in Washington DC
today. “That’s something we have to accept and work through… I appreciate that
– I don’t like it necessarily as a competitor – but that we can compete with.”
Munoz describes Norwegian’s
Irish subsidiary Norwegian Air International (NAI) and its UK
subsidiary Norwegian UK as "clever... labour arbitrage"
plays that allows them to keep costs low by hiring staff in different
countries.
NAI will begin service to
the USA in June with new service on Boeing 737 Max 8 aircraft to Edinburgh from
Hartford, Newburgh Stewart and Providence. It plans to add service to Belfast, Cork,
Dublin and Shannon from the US cities by July.
The airline will base four 737s
in Newburgh and Providence supported by at least 200 pilots and flight
attendants in each city.
“There’s nothing about Norwegian that
is like the Middle Eastern carriers that suggests they’re subsidised,” says
Doug Parker, chairman and chief executive of American, later at the summit.
“It’s never been an issue competing with someone who has a different model or
lower costs – we do that all the time and we’re good at it.”
Parker was referring to the US
mainline carriers' on-going complaint against the Gulf carriers who they claim
have received more than $40 billion in state subsidies that has allowed them to
dump capacity in the US market under open skies.
Emirates Airline, Etihad
Airways and Qatar Airways all deny the allegations.
American and United, along
with Delta Air Lines, are pushing the Trump administration to limit open
skies with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates due to those subsidies. Their
main concern focuses on the ability of carriers from those countries to operate
fifth freedom flights from Europe to the USA, as Emirates does from
Athens and Milan.
Both Munoz and Parker reiterate
their complaints against the Gulf carriers today.
The two executives' comments do
put them at odds with some of their unions, including the Air Line Pilots
Association (ALPA) and Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA), which
vocally oppose Norwegian and NAI.
"International airlines
flagging for convenience are bad for the airline industry and bad for the US
economy," says ALPA president captain Tim Cannoll in response to Munoz and
Parker's statements. "ALPA strongly opposes this scheme, as did United
Airlines and American Airlines in filings with the US Department
of Transportation in 2013 and 2014. These airlines have not modified their
positions with DOT, nor has ALPA changed its position in support of defending
the US aviation industry and American jobs against unfair foreign competition.”
This is a change from Canoll's
view in February, when he was confident that American, United and
other carriers supported the union's view. “They have filed in support of our
position on the docket with DOT. They haven’t said a lot lately. That will
change. I am confident of that," he said at the time.
Updated
with comment from ALPA
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.