By David Hambling5th October 2020
Satellite navigation keeps
our world running in ways many people barely realise, but it is also
increasingly vulnerable. What could we use instead?
When satellite navigation was jammed at Israel’s Ben Gurion airport last year, only the skill of the air
traffic controllers prevented serious accidents. The jamming was apparently
accidental, originating with Russian forces fighting in Syria, but it
highlighted just how dangerous interruptions to the global positioning system –
better known as GPS – can be.
“There is a growing recognition of the need to
protect, toughen, and augment GPS,” says Todd Humphreys, a communications
engineer at the University of Texas, Austin. GPS now underpins a surprising
amount of our everyday lives. In its simplest form it tells us where on Earth
at any time a GPS receiver is. We have them in our mobile phones and cars. They
enable boats to navigate their way through difficult channels and reefs, like a
modern-day lighthouse. Emergency services now rely upon GPS to locate those in
distress.
Less obviously, ports would cease to operate, as
their cranes need GPS to find the right container to move, and
they play a crucial role in logistics operations, allowing car manufacturers
and supermarkets to take advantage of just-in-time delivery systems. Without
it, our supermarket shelves would be emptier and prices would be higher.
The construction industry uses GPS when surveying
and fishermen use it to comply with strict regulations, But GPS is not only
about identifying locations, it is also about time.
The constellation of 30 satellites held in orbit
around the Earth all
use multiple, extremely precise atomic clocks to synchronise their signals.
They allow users to determine the time to within 100 billionths of a second.
Mobile phone networks all use GPS time to synchronise their base stations,
while financial and banking institutions rely upon it to ensure trades and
transfers occur correctly.
Global positioning systems are an important tool for researchers when
studying animal movements and behaviour (Credit: Alamy)
We really would be lost without satellite
navigation. But is there anything out there that could replace it? And how
might we cope without this ubiquitous system?
A loss of satellite navigation for five days
would cost the UK alone more
than £5.1bn ($6.5bn) , according to an assessment by the London School of Economics for the
British Government. A failure of the GPS system would also cost the US economy an
estimated $1bn (£760m) a day, and up to $1.5bn (£1.1bn) a day if it occurred during planting season
for farmers in April and May.
But GPS outages are surprisingly common –
the military regularly
jams it in certain areas while testing equipment or during military exercises. The US
Government also regularly performs tests and exercises that lead to disruption of the
satellite signal, but also
some technical problems
lead to worldwide issues.
There are, of course, other global navigation
satellite systems available – the Russian Glonass, Europe’s Galileo and China’s
BeiDou all work on a similar basis to GPS. But increasingly, interference or
deliberate jamming can also lead to interruptions in the signals from satellite
positioning systems.
You might also like:
- The clocks that rule our world
- Why it’s not surprising that ships collide
- Why north is always at the top of maps
“The military are coming up against jamming quite
frequently now,” says Charley Curry, fellow of the Royal Institute of
Navigation and founder of Chronos Technology, which works in this field.
The military has
especially good reason to be worried. Satellite navigation was originally
developed by the Pentagon, and now guides everything from strategic drones and
warships down to individual smart bombs and foot soldiers. And it is under
threat.
A massive solar storm, one
like the Carrington Event of 1859, could bring down the entire GPS satellite
network
Criminals also use GPS jammers, easily bought
online, to foil the systems used to track stolen cars, not caring who else is
affected in the surrounding area. And there are bigger dangers.
“There is also the remote threat that the whole
GPS constellation could be rendered inoperable in the initial salvo of a war
targeting the US economy by attacking critical infrastructure,” says Humphreys.
Natural forces could be similarly disastrous. A
massive solar storm, one like the Carrington Event of
1859, could bring down the
entire GPS satellite network as surely as a military strike.
But if GPS and its international cousins were to
suddenly disappear – what alternatives could we turn to in an attempt to keep
all our world moving?
One possible backup for
GPS is a new version of Long Range Navigation (Loran), which was developed during World War Two to
guide allied ships while they were crossing the Atlantic. Instead of
satellites, however, it consisted of ground-based transmitters with 200-metre (660-feet)
tall aerial masts broadcasting
radio navigation signals.
While good old fashioned maps can help us find our way, many aspects of
our modern lives would cease to function without GPS (Credit: Alamy)
At first Loran was only accurate to within a few
miles, but by the 1970s it could give a location within a few hundred metres.
The UK and other countries decommissioned their Loran transmitters in the 2000s
when GPS made them redundant, but a modern, enhanced version, known as eLoran
could be as accurate as GPS. It uses more advanced transmitters and receivers
than the original version, along with a technique known as
differential correction –
where the signal is monitored by reference stations and corrected – to improve
its accuracy.
This enhanced version is reportedly capable of
pinpointing locations to an accuracy of less than
10m (32 feet). Unlike
GPS, it is also able to penetrate buildings and tunnels – primarily because it
uses a lower frequency and higher power than satellite signals. The powerful
eLoran signals are much harder to jam and there are no vulnerable satellites.
But someone would have to fund it.
“eLoran is a great technology that could fill
nationwide gaps,” says Humphreys, adding “if there were a commitment to setting
it up and maintaining it”.
Other approaches do not
require additional infrastructure. Long before radio, sailors navigated with
the aid of the sun and stars, using a sextant to measure the angles between
them. Celestial navigation continued into the modern age. And surprisingly
enough, ballistic missiles like Trident still use
astro-navigation during
flight. By using fixes from stars it is possible to pinpoint a location on
Earth to within a thousand metres or so.
Having large numbers of
fast-moving objects to get bearings on means that Skymark can achieve greater
accuracy than was possible with slow-moving stars
But US company Draper Laboratory has developed a
new generation of celestial navigation known as Skymark which uses a small, automated telescope to
track satellites, the International Space Station and other objects orbiting
the Earth along with the stars.
Having large numbers of fast-moving objects to get
bearings on means that Skymark can achieve greater accuracy than was possible
with slow-moving stars. Skymark uses a database of visible satellites – both
working satellites and space junk – and has a claimed accuracy of 15m (49ft),
making it almost as good as GPS. At times it is capable of greater accuracy,
but this depends on how many of these satellites can be seen at once, says
Benjamin Lane, group leader of advanced position, navigation and timing
instrumentation at Draper.
“The best accuracy for celestial navigation with
certainty is within a couple of meters,” he says. “One limitation is the size
of the satellite references.”
Another drawback is that
it only works with a clear view of the sky. Using infrared light rather than
visible light, which can pass more easily through haze and light cloud, helps a
little, but in parts of the northern and southern hemisphere where thick cloud
and grey-skies are more common, it is likely to be less useful.
Tracking fast moving satellites like the International Space Station
has helped to improve the accuracy of celestial navigation (Credit: Alamy)
Perhaps a more day-to-day option might be inertial
navigation, which uses a set of accelerometers to work out the exact speed and
direction that a vehicle is travelling in to calculate its position. Basic
versions are already in common use.
“When your car goes into a tunnel and you lose the
GPS signal, it’s inertial navigation that keeps your position updated,” says
Curry.
The problem with inertial navigation is “drift” –
the calculated position gets less accurate over time as errors build up, so the
inertial navigator in your car is only useful for short GPS interruptions.
Drift could be overcome
with quantum sensors thousands of times more sensitive than existing devices.
In the quantum world, atoms and particles start to behave as both matter and
waves, and acceleration alters the properties of this behaviour. French company
iXBlue is using this technique to build a device to rival GPS
precision, and a team
from Imperial College London, working with laser specialists M Squared, demonstrated a prototype portable
quantum accelerometer in 2018.
The US Department of
Transport is now holding a competition to select possible backups for GPS
Such quantum sensors are still confined to
laboratories and are years away from a usable end product.
Optical navigation, in which automated systems
with cameras use landmarks like buildings and road junctions, may be with us
much sooner. An early version, known as Digital Scene Matching, was developed for cruise missiles.
ImageNav, developed by Scientific Systems for the US Air
Force, is a modern optical navigation system for aircraft. It has a terrain
database of the area being navigated and matches it with input from video
cameras to work out its location. ImageNav has been successfully
tested on a
number of aircraft, but could also find uses in self-driving vehicles.
Swedish company Everdrone also recently carried out the first drone delivery between hospitals without using GPS. Their
system uses a combination of optical flow – measuring speed by the rate of
which scenery passes below – and landmark identification to find its way from
point to point with GPS-like precision. Of course, this method relies on have a
complete and accurate image database of the area you are navigating, which is
likely to require a lot of memory and frequent updates.
Inertial navigation is what takes over when in-car navigation devices
lose the GPS signal inside tunnels (Credit: Alamy)
The UK is developing a backup system for the
timing synchronisation services that GPS provides in the form of The National Timing Centre program, the first such national service in the
world. When it becomes operational in 2025, it will involve sets of
precise atomic clocks at distributed, secure locations across the UK, providing
timing signals via cable and radio services. The idea is that if satellite
signals go down, there is no single vulnerable centre that could be brought
down by an accident, technical glitch or cyberattack.
Ultimately no single system may be able to replace
the power of satellite navigation systems such as GPS, and we may end up with a
mix-and-match of different solutions for ships, planes and cars. The US
Department of Transport is now holding a competition to select possible backups
for GPS. There is a real question though over whether any alternative will be
in place soon enough.
“There’s now an awareness of the problem, but
things are still moving at glacial speed,” says Curry.
We are becoming ever more reliant on accurate
navigation. Self-driving cars, delivery drones, and flying taxis are expected
to appear on and above our roads over the next decade. All of them will be
dependent on GPS.
As Curry notes, one person with a powerful jammer
in a could knock out GPS across an area the size of London from the right
place. Unless adequate backup systems are developed, in the future whole cities
might grind to a halt at the flick of a switch.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.