With the U.S. Air Force intending to retire its A-10
Warthog fleet by the end of the decade, many within the A-10 community want a
suitable replacement for that aircraft. Such a capability should be
cost-effective, as well as bring new abilities to the fight — especially one
against China in the Pacific. However, at present the service has no plans to
replace the A-10. Patrick “BURT” Brown, an Air Force weapons officer with more
than 2,000 hours in the A-10C, suggests how buying F/A-18E/Fs fits the Air
Force’s imperatives and keeps the A-10’s unique braintrust intact. You can read
Brown’s reasoning, which to some may be surprising, in
this article.
Meanwhile, the pending arrival of the U.S. Army's new
Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) could
reduce some of the readiness risks that are associated with a potential
transfer to Ukraine of older Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) — the
tactical ballistic missile that PrSM intends to replace — according to Douglas
Bush, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and
Technology. The Ukrainian government has been actively seeking ATACMS for many
months. The weapon has a significantly greater range than most of its existing
ground-based strike options and it hits much harder. However, U.S. officials
have repeatedly demurred, often citing the small size of its stockpile of these
strategically important munitions, among a number of other major factors.
We are also continuing our rolling coverage of the
conflict in Ukraine as it develops, which can be found at The
War Zone. You can also check out highlights of all our coverage from
the last week below.
--
Oliver Parken
The War
Zone
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.