EASA on Spoofing: https://tinyurl.com/3sjssamx
The Serious Threat Of GPS Spoofing: An Analysis
Patrick Veillette, Ph.D. October 09, 2023
Aircraft afflicted with GPS Spoofing have flown perilously close to the Iranian border without clearance to fly into Iran's airspace. Credit: OpsGroup
A serious threat to the safety of
air navigation has emerged in recent weeks, occurring to a wide range of
civilian transport aircraft while traversing airspace in which deviations would
lead to intrusions into Iranian airspace without a clearance. The
culprit appears to be fake GPS signals which are causing complete navigation
failure.
OpsGroup, a membership organization
specializing in international flight operations, has collected 20 separate
incident reports as of September 28, 2023. The number of incidents and
the geographic focus of these recent incidents make this more than a mere
coincidence.
Nefarious (though yet to be
identified) forces are likely behind this, and the consequences could turn into
an international crisis and possibly the loss of an innocent civilian aircraft
in a region that is already a high-risk area near an active conflict
zone.
The name of this new menace is “GPS
Spoofing”, which is different from GPS jamming. GPS jamming means that
one’s aircraft is unable to receive standard GPS signals and the aircraft’s
navigation system must rely on other inputs to determine its position.
Aircraft equipped with advanced Inertia Reference Systems (“IRS”) are
able to continue operating sufficiently when GPS signals are jammed, but GPS
Spoofing is a new threat which found a hidden back-door through the navigation
software to completely disable the entire navigation system.
The Flight Management System (FMS)
uses a hierarchy for its navigational information, beginning with GPS, then in
subsequent order it uses the IRS, DME/DME, VOR/DME, and finally Dead Reckoning
modes. An IRS uses a combination of gyroscopes, accelerometers and
electronics to provide precise attitude, trajectory and navigation information.
One advantage of inertia navigation is that it can work in all
environments. However, inertia navigation “drift” errors accumulate of
time, and if they are not updated at sufficient intervals with correct
positional data, this can lead to large position errors. When GPS
signals are not available, such as during GPS jamming, the sensor fusion
software utilizes the other sources of information to provide precise
navigation continuously.
These latest incidents involve
“Spoofing” in which the false GPS signals trick the aircraft’s FMS into
indicating that the aircraft is more than 60 nm off-track, and then completely
disables the aircraft’s Inertia Reference System (IRS). Since the IRS
utilizes GPS signals to continuously update the position information, the
navigation system software assumes that the fake GPS is correct, causing the
IRS to fail. When the navigation system compares the (fake) GPS signals
to other navigation inputs such as from ground-based nav-aids, the software is
unable to comprehend the gross error, and all of the navigation systems end up
being corrupted.
These recent incidents are indicative of an active attack on an
aircraft’s total navigation system. Furthermore, current IRS systems were not
designed to counter this type of attack. All of the reported “GPS
Spoofing” events experienced an unusable IRS and, in many cases, all navigation
capability was lost.
Credit: OpsGroup
One of the reports in the OpsGroup
database occurred on Sept. 9 to a Challenger 604 while on a flight from Europe
to Qatar. The route of flight went through Turkey and Iraq. The aircraft
experienced minor jamming while transitioning from Bulgarian to Turkish
airspace. As they neared the Turkey/Iraq border, they lost both GPS sensors but
continued the flight with the back-up navigational input in the IRS.
North of Baghdad, the flight crew lost anything related to the navigation
system, and the IRS indicated that they had drifted 70-90 miles off track.
Furthermore, the avionics indicated a ground speed of zero and 250 knots
of wind. The FMS’s reverted to the dead reckoning mode, but with no
accurate update of their position, the flight crew had no reliable navigation
information. At this point, the flight crew relied on ATC vectors to
their destination.
On Sept. 15, an Embraer Legacy 650
operating on Airway UM688 experienced a similar set of failures and nearly
entered Iran airspace with no clearance. Other aircraft involved in
similar incidents include the Challenger CL650, Dassault Falcon 8X and
Bombardier Global Express.
Has Your Aircraft Been
Targeted?
Clues that your aircraft has been
targeted by spoofing include a large Estimated Position Uncertainty (“EPU”),
incorrect display of the UTC, a large shift in the GPS position, nav page or
PFD warnings about position error, as well as other aircraft transmitting
comparable errors.
There is potential for this type of
event to be seen elsewhere. While the reports in recent weeks are
concentrated near the Iranian border, the risk of inadvertently flying through
another sovereign nation’s airspace without permission has resulted in severe
reaction in the past. Civilian transports have no defensive capability
against sophisticated surface-to-air missile system.
This was evidenced on Aug. 29, 1999,
when Eritrean air traffic control (ATC) reported loss of contact with a Learjet
35A while en route from Luxor, Egypt, to Nairobi, Kenya. Ethiopia had posted a
warning that flights directly from Eritrea over Ethiopia were prohibited. The
flight plan was filed through Djibouti to avoid an Eritrean/Ethiopian border
crossing. The airplane was later found crashed near Adwa, Ethiopia. The
Ethiopian Defense Force reported a shoot-down of an aircraft in the vicinity.
Both pilots were fatally injured, and the airplane was destroyed. There were no
passengers.
If the sneak signals are entering
through the infected GPS signal, is it possible to erect a “firewall” from
allowing these to get into the IRS? Hopefully. Since this is a
rapidly emerging new threat, much work must now be done to detect how these
menacing signals are able to sneak through the software. This will likely
require a multi-layered solution to include a software fix from the manufacturers
to find the sneak circuit and erect the equivalent of a firewall.
Recommended Actions
In the meantime, are there any
recommendations on what flight crews can do in flight if the aircraft appears
to be the victim of spoofing? Mark Zee of OpsGroup recommended
de-selecting the GPS on the sensor page. This will cause the NAV system
to revert to signals from the DME/DME and VOR/DME modes if nearby navaids are
available. Alternatively, the NAV will degrade to a dead reckoning mode. This
latter step is completely dependent upon the navigation unit having an accurate
last update on location. Zee also recommends using conventional ground
base navaids (VOR/DME/NDB).
Zee pointed out that FBW aircraft
have extensively integrated GPS into their designs to such an extent that the
FAA has issued warnings to these aircraft to avoid areas where GPS spoofing or
jamming may be active.
Manufacturers of military navigation
systems have been developing a multi-layered approach to combat the problem of
GPS disruptions. For instance, Honeywell has introduced a multitude of
alternative navigation systems to augment the availability, integrity and
performance of inertia navigation. They have developed a Vision Aided
Navigation System using a live camera (optical and/or IR) which compares the
image with maps to provide an un-jammable position with a horizontal position
accuracy of 10 meters. Their Celestial Aided Navigation system utilizes a
star tracker. It is likewise un-jammable and recently demonstrated an
accuracy of 30 m. An Embraer 170 was recently used as a test platform to
demonstrate the effectiveness of Honeywell’s Magnetic Anomaly Aided system
which measures the earth’s magnetic strength to compare with magnetic maps to
identify a vehicle’s position. Honeywell’s Radar Aided system uses radars
to measure velocity and provide this information to the INS, thus improving the
INS’s accuracy.
While some of the avionics
manufacturers already have this in-house expertise to provide military aircraft
with alternative navigation in GPS-denied environments, will these methods be
readily adapted for civilian use? Perhaps not due to their complexity and
expense, however, their in-house expertise likely has already done extensive
studies trying to solve this problem for the military. The knowledge
learned from those studies may be useful solving this new threat in the
civilian sector.
Clearly the avionics manufacturers
will be scrambling their sneak circuit specialists to find out how these
nefarious GPS signals are entering into the navigation system, and then fix
these holes.
This problem will also require
specific air crew training to help them detect these errors, understand the
error messages on the FMS, PFD and ND, as well as being informed on
recommendations to resolve these in-flight, especially for flight crews
transiting high-risk flight regions. Many of us will be standing by for
official guidance from authoritative sources on this emerging threat.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.