Five years after MH17 downing, airline conflict alert system remains
patchy
SEOUL/MONTREAL (Reuters) - When Pakistan closed its
airspace during conflict with India in February, Malaysia Airlines was not one
of the carriers left scrambling to re-route flights because it had already done
so two weeks earlier, the carrier's chief executive said.
FILE PHOTO: An armed pro-Russian separatist stands
on part of the wreckage of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 plane after it
crashed near the settlement of Grabovo in the Donetsk region, July 17, 2014.
REUTERS/Maxim Zmeyev/File Photo
Nearly five years after Malaysia
Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by a missile over Ukraine, killing all 298
people on board, carriers like Malaysia Airlines are increasingly taking steps
to uncover any threats to their planes.
But concerns persist over
inadequate government intelligence sharing and a reluctance by countries
involved in conflict to divulge information or sacrifice overflight fees by
shutting their skies, safety experts said.
"The wound is still here in
the whole organization and we take safety very seriously," Malaysia Airlines
chief executive Izham Ismail told Reuters on the sidelines of an International
Air Transport Association (IATA) conference in Seoul.
In the aftermath of
the shooting down of MH17, the aviation industry backed the creation by a U.N.
agency of a conflict zone website as a one-stop repository for route
planning.
But when the site was later closed after complaints from some
countries over information-sharing, airlines turned elsewhere for
advice.
"For the big 50 airlines, they have the resources to dedicate a
security department to the job," said Mark Zee, founder of OPSGROUP, which
launched the free website Safe Airspace to provide guidance after
MH17.
"For everyone else - and that is thousands of operators, I can tell
you that many of them have a really hard time making a decent risk assessment. I
see it in the emails we get every day."
Airlines are spending millions of
dollars a year on extra fuel flying roundabout routes in the Middle East and
Africa to avoid conflict zones.
And carriers still see routes above
war-torn countries differently, just like before MH17, when British Airways and
Air France avoided eastern Ukraine, but Lufthansa and Singapore Airlines flew
over it.
"This is where we need better information," IATA Senior Vice
President, Safety and Flight Operations Gilberto Lopez-Meyer said in
Seoul.
Qatar Airways, for one, recently returned to flying over Syria as
part of its efforts to grapple with a two-year Gulf dispute that has blocked it
from using the airspace of many of its neighbors. CEO Akbar al-Baker said the
airline would not fly anywhere that is not safe.
'MORE AWARE'
The
United States and other countries ban their airlines from flying over Syrian
airspace at any altitude due to safety risks, according to a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) conflict zone website set up after
MH17.
Yet the resources that are available to airlines often communicate
changing threat levels too slowly and informally to be of use, according to the
Dutch Safety Board, which led the MH17 investigation and released post-crash
recommendations in February this year.
While the Netherlands shares
confidential information on threats to its own carriers on a formal basis, other
countries remain reluctant to do so.
The site set up after MH17 by the
U.N.'s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) closed after "states
objected to anybody but themselves publishing information about hazards in their
airspace", said a source involved with the creation of the site who declined to
be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter.
Instead, the use
of commercial services like OPSGROUP grew among airlines polled after MH17, the
Dutch Safety Board said.
"I think after MH17 people became more aware of
the problem. They seek information," said Mohammed Aziz, a former Lebanese air
accident investigator who is now a consultant with Aviation Strategies
International.
"The problem is before they weren't seeking information.
They were waiting for information to come their way."
Montreal-based ICAO
has also called for air traffic service authorities to report conflict zone
hazards in notices to pilots. But these new requirements do not take effect
until November 2020 and still put the onus on countries to share
information.
"Rules alone do not change the behavior of states," said
Jeff Poole, director general of the Civil Air Services Navigation Organization
(CANSO).
"However, we see that more and more states take the correct
responsibility."
Abonner på:
Legg inn kommentarer (Atom)
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.