Uber’s Aerial Rideshare Project ‘Entering the Next Phase’
Uber's Elevate project is "right on target," the company said at a vertical flight conference in San Jose. Image: Rendering of an Uber Skyport in LA by SHoP. (Uber/SHoP)
SAN JOSE, Ca. — When Uber published a white paper in 2017 promising to build an
affordable aerial rideshare service with all-electric aircraft, many viewed the
project with the same seriousness as Silicon Valley efforts to cure death or Google’s moonshot exploration of a space elevator.
Flying cars? Again with this?
Now, three years later, the company says progress
is “right on target” — and the FAA, NASA, and a number of billion dollar
companies are on board.
Speaking at the Transformative Vertical Flight
conference in San Jose, Mark Moore, Uber’s director of aviation engineering,
moved the conversation away from building and certifying the all-new class of
electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft and towards other
challenges.
“We’re entering the next phase of Elevate, which is
all about the preparation of cities for these incredible vehicles which we’re
all realizing are very real and well along the path of certification,” said
Moore. Uber Air is slated to launch in Los Angeles, Dallas and Melbourne in
2023.
Though significant challenges remain, the FAA has
also signaled progress on aircraft certification. Last week, Jay Merkle, head
of the agency’s unmanned aircraft integration office, said that six aircraft intended for urban air mobility applications
are “well along” in the
type certification process, insisting that new regulations or rewrites will not
be needed to certify and operate these new aircraft.
In San Jose, Mike Romanowski, director of policy
and innovation at the FAA’s aircraft certification office, revealed more
progress, speaking at the rapidly-growing annual eVTOL conference hosted by the
Vertical Flight Society.
“These are rough estimates, but I would say we
have about 70 different [certification] projects that we’re working at a
reasonable level of rigor … of those, probably 15, maybe a dozen, are in the
eVTOL regime. We’re actually physically laying out the pathway to certification
requirements.”
The media environment for urban air mobility is
becoming increasingly favorable as well, according to an analysis conducted by
Lufthansa’s innovation hub, which is studying how the company will participate
in the emerging industry. Online coverage of eVTOLs and UAM was split between
favorable and unfavorable for many years, according to Lufthansa’s analysis,
but skewed increasingly favorable in 2018 and 2019.
Uber has a spotty history — to put it generously —
with community engagement. For years, under founder Travis Kalanick, the
company operated under the common Silicon Valley mantra of “growth at all
costs,” willing and eager to play dirty and break laws in order to gain access
to markets and expand its user base. Uber has now provided customers more than
15 billion trips globally.
But for Uber Air, the company has repeatedly
expressed a focus on community engagement, understanding that noise and safety
— both perception and reality — will ultimately determine market access, and in
many cities helicopters’ favorability ratings look like political candidates
who rarely get elected.
Uber has studied both failed and successful
community engagements efforts, reaching a few conclusions that will underpin
their approach: “Never surprise the community,” said Moore. “Give them plenty
of time and data on what you’re trying to do so they can buy into it.”
Aircraft development partners will be required by
Uber to drastically reduce their acoustic footprint, targeting 15 decibels
lower than the FAA’s Stage 3 standards for traditional helicopters. Moore’s
team is working to model acceptable locations for vertiports, where noise from
takeoff and landing won’t drastically exceed background noise levels in the
community.
Though eVTOLs will be much quieter in cruise mode,
Uber is focused on flyover noise pollution as well. Moore said the goal is to
limit impact to 1.5 decibels, measured as an “equivalent continuous sound
level,” or Leq.
“Depending on where we’re flying over … that
translates to only 23 flights per hour over San Francisco, all the way up to
235 flights per hour over high-density residential in San Diego,” Moore said.
“This is why you’ve got to have a wing,” Moore
added, speaking to aircraft designers in the room. “If you stay in powered lift
during that entire cruise, you will almost certainly not have a good noise
signature at altitudes such as 1,000 feet, which makes sense for these short,
urban trips.”
The other key to acceptance, particularly at
scale, is affordability. There is little doubt that eVTOLs will be able to
capture congested markets currently serviced by helicopters, but whether aerial
rideshare can compete on price with and capture market share from terrestrial
transit — which Uber asserts it can — is still up in the air.
“If there isn’t a really firm business case and
strong economics behind even the coolest idea, it’s not going to matter,” Moore
said. “That’s why I’m so proud that Uber is bringing that business case that
makes sense.”
“I know that some of you lived through the very
light jet era of Dayjet and Eclipse,” he added, referring to previous industry
hype around a significant expansion to the aerospace market. “I analyzed that
at NASA … this is very, very different in terms of a feasible business case.
This is really happening.”
Similar to its asset-light approach to rideshare,
Uber doesn’t intend to own the aircraft that make up the Uber Air service.
Through the Elevate ecosystem, Uber has provided some level of engineering
support and guidance, but ownership models are likely to vary, including
leasing companies typical to aerospace.
“We very much equate this urban aviation market to
commercial airlines, just much shorter trips, and a large portion of commercial
airliners are owned by lease companies,” Moore said. “The challenge there is
they need to understand the residual value of these vehicles at the end of the
lease, and when these vehicles are designed for essentially a brand new market,
it’s a very significant question. So it’s important we think ahead to 5-7 years
out after we introduce service to when [these vehicles] will be retiring and
we’ll be bringing on the new vehicles … that there’s cargo missions for them to
do and an opportunity space for a reasonable residual value.”
Some of the vehicle partners with larger balance
sheets — including Joby Aviation’s largest investor, Toyota, which Moore said
has access to $100 billion in cash — may find it financially advantageous to
maintain ownership of the aircraft, creating a more dependable source of
revenue.
“[Having] a steady income is a really good thing that could lead this entire industry to a healthier balance sheet.”“Most of the companies are really excited about essentially going to the equivalent of power by the hour, by having a revenue stream that is constantly coming in so they don’t get into the difficulties of cyclic markets,” Moore said. “Helicopter companies have had this in spades. One year they sell a ton of aircraft, and the next year oil prices are low and they hardly sell any, and that’s not a good thing for production lines.”
In the past few weeks, Hyundai and Toyota have
made major commitments to urban air mobility, though companies including
Porsche, Audi and Geely have made moves into the third dimension as well.
“I predict within the next year and a half you'll
see almost every major automotive company step into this industry in
significant ways,” Moore stated.
One more bold prediction from Uber’s chief
aviation engineer: “There’s no question in my mind that someday Joby will be a
$20-50 billion aerospace corporation.”
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.