Pictured is an
F-35A Lightning II with the 355th Fighter Squadron in a weather shelter at
Eielson AFB, Alaska on Nov. 13th. "During the winter months temperatures
in interior Alaska will often reach 20 below zero, challenging crew chiefs to
maintain and sustain one of the U.S. Air Force’s most valuable assets in one of
the world’s coldest regions," the U.S. Air Force said (Air Force Photo)
Share:
By Frank Wolfe |
3 days ago |
12/05/2024
Elon Musk had his 4-year-old son X Æ A-12, or “X” for short, on his
shoulders when the SpaceX billionaire
emerged from a meeting with Capitol Hill legislators on Thursday afternoon. As
the reportorial herd behind the rope lines shouted questions about “conflicts
of interest,” Musk smiled before sauntering on and disappearing again.
Musk is the Trump designee to head a new Department of Government
Efficiency (DOGE) with fellow tech mogul Vivek Ramaswamy. Musk and Ramaswamy
have pledged to cut government significantly–their most prominent targets being
DEI initiatives, personnel, and programs they view as wasteful or unaligned
with “American values.”
One program that Musk turned his attention to just before Thanksgiving on his X social media platform is the Lockheed Martin [LMT] F-35 (Defense Daily, Nov. 25). Musk wrote that the “F-35 design was broken at the
requirements level because it was required to be too many things to too many
people” and disparaged the fighter as “a s–t design” and “an expensive and
complex jack of all trades, master of none.”
“Success was never in the set of possible outcomes, and manned fighter
jets are obsolete in the age of drones anyway [and] will just get pilots
killed,” according to Musk.
Some talking heads read that as a Delphic oracle of doom for the
fifth-generation fighter, which has struggled with low mission capable rates
and sustainment problems at the same time that it has received extensive,
possibly excessive, praise from fighter pilots.
The F-35 is not likely to disappear any time soon.
“We’re not gonna eliminate the F-35,” House Armed Services Committee
Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) said Thursday in response to a question on Musk’s
comments on the F-35.
In a sidebar with a reporter on Thursday during the Capitol Hill
meeting with Musk, Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.), a member of the HASC tactical
air and land forces panel, said that it is not yet possible to nix or curtail
the F-35 buy “because we don’t have anything else.”
“We can’t throw everything out,” he said. “My best guess would be we
need to let the private sector look into the Pentagon and find the solutions to
our air defense and offensive capabilities in the future.”
“We have the F-35,” Gimenez said. “We’ve got to keep the F-35. We can’t
disarm.”
Are manned fighters obsolete, as Musk asserts? “Not yet,” Gimenez
replied. “They’re getting there.”
Asked whether he believes the artificial intelligence-enabled CCA is
not yet at the point where fielding is imminent, Gimenez said, “Exactly.”
Yet, he also echoed Musk. “The problem I have with the F-35 is it tried
to be too many things to too many people,” Gimenez said. “If you want an air
superiority fighter, get an air superiority fighter. If you want a strike
fighter, get a strike fighter…We should have learned the lesson of the F-4.”
That tri-service and international fighter initially fielded in 1961,
and McDonnell Douglas–now part of Boeing [BA]–built
more than 5,000 through 1981–a run that helped make the F-4 a top Cold War
combat aircraft.
Lockheed Martin beat Boeing in 2001 in the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
competition. The Marine Corps’ F-35B and Air Force F-35A entered service in
2015-16, while the Navy F-35C became operational in 2019. The company has built
more than 1,000 thus far for the U.S. military services and foreign militaries.
Before Lockheed Martin’s 2001 JSF contract win, the U.S. Air Force,
Marine Corps, Navy and the United Kingdom developed and signed off on
performance requirements–not system specifications–over seven years.
Musk seems to have an affinity for reconnaissance aircraft. He and the
Canadian singer Grimes said that they got inspiration for the name of their
4-year-old son, X Æ A-12, pronounced “X Ash A Twelve,” after the Lockheed
A-12–the forebear to the SR-71 Blackbird.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.