CFM Lifts Veil On Leap Engine Test Details
Still in the midst of the most intense test effort in its 41-year history,
CFM International is poised for simultaneous European and U.S. certification of
the Leap-1A, the first of its next-generation engine family destined to power
the Airbus A320neo.
Although engine certification is expected on
Nov. 20, details of the specific A320neo flight test campaign, along with those
planned by Comac for the recently rolled out Leap-1C-powered C919, and by
Boeing, remain closely held as a prerogative of the manufacturers. Pitched
head-to-head with Pratt & Whitney's PW1100G on the A320neo, Airbus has
maintained a close watch on the release of official information for
competition-sensitive reasons on the virtually parallel development tracks for
the two engines.
However, with certification of the first major model completed, CFM is able
for the first time to provide Aviation Week with the most in-depth review yet of
the engine-maker's side of the test campaign and to offer some perspective on
the behind-the-scenes efforts underway.
Since launching the Leap program, already the largest test effort CFM has
undertaken, the General Electric-Snecma joint venture has added more engines to
support the "ABC" (Airbus, Boeing, Comac) trio. Part of the reason is the
enormous wave of orders for the Leap family, which-with at least seven months
still to go before entry into service on the A320neo-stands at just under 10,000
engines. The CFM56, in contrast, passed the same milestone in 1995, some 21
years after the launch of the company and 14 years after entry into service on
the DC-8.
"We didn't know that, of course, as we started to prepare," says CFM
Executive Vice President Francois Bastin. "What was very clear for us is that it
is a reengining program. That means [if] the aircraft will be on time, we have
responsibility for the schedule, and we will have to do it. In our mind we were
acutely conscious that no one has ever done this before, so our response to that
is, 'Let's do it like we've never done it before. Let's not be scared of what we
have to do.'"
Comprising 34 CFM engineering test engines and 48 "ABC" compliance engines,
the full test effort is scheduled to include 82 Leap-1A/B and -Cs. "In addition,
we have more than 20 engine test stands and two flying testbeds. At no time in
history can we find such a commitment over such a short span of time," says CFM
President Jean-Paul Ebanga.
The partners provisioned the test infrastructure to handle the additional
workload. "We are not different or better than anyone, but we knew we would do
the job and make investments to reach our objectives," says Bastin, who cites
the development of a new 12-meter (39-ft.) indoor closed test cell for fan
blade-out conditions at Villaroche, France, as an example. "We opened four
brand-new test cells to be ready for the expansive test program we had designed:
two in Belgium, one in Poland and one in France, on top of the ones we had
already prepared for Leap in Villaroche," he says. "We wanted overkill, to make
sure we were prepared for risk mitigation at all stages of the program. That's
why we ran so many component tests on the [composite] fan. The fan has been a
gigantic technology maturation program, so the same spirit was taken to the
whole test program as it unfolded. We cannot afford to have a bottleneck or to
make compromises-we have to be battle-ready for this."
Worldwide, CFM has run Leap engines at 12 test sites, with a 13th to be
added shortly at Avio in Pomigliano, Italy. Aside from the sites in France,
Belgium and Poland, the engine has been run extensively at GE sites in Dallas,
Peebles and Evendale in Ohio, and West Palm Beach and Eglin AFB in Florida, as
well as at the company's icing and endurance test site at Winnipeg, Manitoba.
All these sites are being used for engineering and certification engine tests.
CFM says in the future maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) test cell
locations will also be qualified, so that after overhaul an engine can be tested
locally. As with the CFM56, these will be sited around the world.
The large number of engineering test engines far exceeds the minimum
required for certification, says CFM Leap program manager Gareth Richards: "The
GE90 [certification program], for example, was seven engines for the -115B, and
the scope is much bigger than we need." Part of the reason for the larger test
fleet was the early decision to conduct critical tests well in advance of
certification. "We did a practice block test, which is an arduous triple
red-line test in which fan and core speed as well as exhaust gas temperature
limits are simultaneously exceeded over a sustained period," he says. "We had to
build a special engine to do that, and we ran that for about a year before the
certification block test. We did the same with icing about a year ahead of the
actual certification because they are lengthy tests and time-critical. We wanted
to derisk the program by not putting them on the critical path."
Richards says results from any discoveries were then introduced prior to
certification tests. "For example, on the icing test we chose to improve the
variable stator system and made it more robust, so that was a finding. The other
value of that was [that] after we ran the practice icing test, we had a
serviceable engine that had sustained stress due to icing," he says. "Now we
have an engine that looks like a customer engine, so we brought it back from
Winnipeg to Peebles and ran 500 extra cycles on it. And we used it to extend
serviceability limits so [that] when the customers receive their first manual
there is provision for running it further after it has some distress." The
engine has a nick in the leading edge of a compressor blade from ice damage. "We
took that credit and put it directly into the service manual, so there will
already be an allowance in there that says if you see this condition it is
acceptable," he adds.
Another batch of 48 engines is being delivered to the three airframe makers
to show compliance to the specification for flight testing. As of early
November, 12 engines had been delivered, with the majority going to Airbus,
which will shortly have three Leap-1A-powered A320neos in flight test. At least
one shipset of Leap-1Bs has been delivered to Boeing for the first 737 MAX, due
to roll out in December, while another set has been sent to China for the
initial C919, which was unveiled in November.
The first Leap-1A-powered A320neo flew on May 19 and was joined by a second
test aircraft on Sept. 29. According to program sources, the two aircraft had
accumulated more than 360 flight hours and almost 145 flights by mid-November.
Both the 737 MAX and C919 are expected to enter flight test in 2016.
"Tests are going flawlessly," says Richards. "There are no engine issues or
concerns identified in flight test to date."
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.