AARP Opposes Age 65 Retirement for Charter/Frax Pilots
- April 20, 2018, 10:01 AM
Highly influential U.S. association AARP is opposing a manager’s amendment in the FAA reauthorization bill that would impose a mandatory retirement age of 65 for certain Part 135 charter and Part 91K fractional pilots. “AARP has long opposed mandatory retirement; using an arbitrary age as a proxy for competence is wrong in any occupation, and it is wrong for pilots,” AARP wrote in a letter to House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman Bill Shuster and ranking member Pete DeFazio.
“Pilots
should be judged on the basis of their individual ability, flying skills, and
their health, not on stereotypes or mistaken assumptions about their fitness
based on age,” the association, which has 38 million members, told the
congressmen. “The pilots affected are already subject to twice-yearly medical
certifications and ‘check ride’ tests of fitness and competency to fly. AARP
supports requirements for testing and exams that are designed to measure the
job-related characteristics needed to do the job. If different or additional
types of tests are needed, the focus should be on determining that.”
AARP argues
that the proposal is not about safety. “Otherwise, it would not have a coverage
threshold of 100,000 flights per year, which apparently applies only to one
company,” it notes. That company is NetJets.
“The
shortage of pilots facing carriers—a circumstance due in no small part due to
the impending mandatory retirements of boomer-generation pilots—has some
experts proposing that the mandatory retirement age for [airline] pilots
be increased,” AARP said in the letter. “A proposal to impose a
compulsory retirement age on pilots who currently are not subject to one is a
proposal headed in exactly the wrong direction.”
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.