FEDEX ASKS PERMISSION TO INSTALL ANTI-MISSILE LASERS ON ITS CARGO JET
MAYBE ALL PLANES SHOULD HAVE THIS?
FedEx has asked the US Federal Aviation Administration if it could install
anti-missile lasers on cargo jets, according to a request filed earlier this
month. The FAA request is set to be published on the public register next
week.
Heat-seeking missiles detect and target heat from cargo jet engines, and
because these planes are less maneuverable that a fighter jet, they’re hard to
shake off. Gizmodo reports that anti-missile lasers act like a distraction,
shining an infrared laser directly at the missile to disrupt its ability to
track a heat signature.
Although it may seem out of left field, supply chain issues have been
causing food and product shortages since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Last year,
hackers even deployed ransomware attacks on a major agricultural services
provider. With those cyberpunk logistics challenges in mind, FedEx’s application
makes a little more sense.
“In recent years, in several incidents abroad, civilian aircraft were fired
upon by man-portable air defense systems,” the application letter reads.
And Beyond
It also wouldn’t be the first time the US has deployed armed merchant
vessels, either. Back in WWII, Merchant Marine civilian sailors voluntarily
crewed armed cargo ships that kept Allied forces around the world fed and
supplied. FedEx might not be shipping wartime necessities abroad, but protecting
what supplies we do have could prevent further shortages and panics at
home.
When FedEx first tested similar equipment back in 2008, CBS reported the
lasers were eye-safe. In addition, Gizmodo reports that the current application
includes new features, reporting and important safety information for airline
crew. The lasers really shouldn’t pose a problem to civilians on the ground,
then, and it makes us wonder — should all passenger planes have this tech?
Considering that MH17 — the civilian plane that crashed in Ukraine, killing
nearly 300 people — was allegedly shot down by the Russian government,
according investigative publication Bellingcat, it seems like a no-brainer. A
safety measure that could protect passengers in the event of an attack that
doesn’t harm civilians on the ground nor could be used as an offensive weapon
seems like the kind of precaution every airline passenger deserves.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar
Merk: Bare medlemmer av denne bloggen kan legge inn en kommentar.